KMC Forums

 
  REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Already a member? Log-in!
 
 
Home » Star Wars » Star Wars: Literature & Expanded Universe » Star Wars Versus Forum » episodes one two and three, vs four five and six


episodes one two and three, vs four five and six
Started by: DarthMaul9123

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Darth_Hexus
Cool Joe.

Registered: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio


 

episodes one two and three, vs four five and six

all the masses of characters versus the masses of characters, or simply which did you like better?


__________________
We are Amerca's Team

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 06:55 PM
Click here to Send Darth_Hexus a Private Message Find more posts by Darth_Hexus Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: The Netherlands


 

OT wins every time, they have the cooler characters and the by far superior army's.. .The Jedi wouldn't be able to make a huge difference as they would still be destroyed by the Imperial navy.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 06:59 PM
Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
reborn_213
Scruffy Nerf Herder

Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Picking up some power converters.


 

Hmmm, interesting, Fishy. As I seem to remember all the armys from the OT sucked and were slow. The turrets on ships weren't nearly as fast as in the OT. The Rebels' best pilot, Luke, was crap compared to most of the average clone pilots, who did flips and a whole bunch of eyecandy moves, while Luke just flew down a trench with turrets shooting over his head where they can't reach him. The OT armys suck because they aren't bobbing and weaving every second. And don't blame the technology of the 1970's and 1980's, what we see in the movies is the highest form of canon.


__________________

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 09:13 PM
Click here to Send reborn_213 a Private Message Find more posts by reborn_213 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: The Netherlands


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by jollyjim311
Hmmm, interesting, Fishy. As I seem to remember all the armys from the OT sucked and were slow. The turrets on ships weren't nearly as fast as in the OT. The Rebels' best pilot, Luke, was crap compared to most of the average clone pilots, who did flips and a whole bunch of eyecandy moves, while Luke just flew down a trench with turrets shooting over his head where they can't reach him. The OT armys suck because they aren't bobbing and weaving every second. And don't blame the technology of the 1970's and 1980's, what we see in the movies is the highest form of canon.


We never see a real fleet battle from close up, we see a few fighters. Even in ROTJ the Star Destroyers and Super Star Destroyers just sit there... What we see the capitol ships do is nothing compared to what they could do.

Those ships however are an incredibly amount more powerful then every ship in the OT. They have more weapons they are bigger faster and they are part of an army that had years to develop. It would be illogical for a fleet to become weaker, and actually everything in EU says a SSD or even a SD is far more powerful then any kind of PT ship.

Just look at the difference between a Star Destroyer

http://www.starwars.com/databank/st...oyer/index.html

and a Trade federation cruiser

http://www.starwars.com/databank/st...iser/index.html

It can not compare, An SSD is even bigger then an SD, it would ravage through the Trade Federation ships... Who were on par with everything the republic had. The PT would be destroyed in naval combat. The ground weapons were also always younger versions of what the OT movies had. The OT had far superior weapons and ships. It did have weaker troops, but the PT only has 1.2 million clones to fight...

The Death Star had about a sixth of that on board of it... 1 battle station, granted a huge one had more then a sixth of that, and the Death Star sure as hell wasn't a Sixth of the imperial navy.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 09:27 PM
Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
reborn_213
Scruffy Nerf Herder

Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Picking up some power converters.


 

Well, we don't see any of that in the movies. And if i can't apply this policy to individual characters (Obi Wan, Luke, Darth Vader), then why can you apply it to ships, which were much less visually impressive in the OT.


__________________

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 09:35 PM
Click here to Send reborn_213 a Private Message Find more posts by reborn_213 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Winter Soldier
Who cares...

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Pain...


 

Prequels, easy.


__________________
I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species that I realized you aren't actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with its surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply, and multiply until every natural resource is consumed. And the only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You are a plague, and we...are the cure.

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 09:46 PM
Click here to Send Winter Soldier a Private Message Find more posts by Winter Soldier Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: The Netherlands


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by jollyjim311
Well, we don't see any of that in the movies. And if i can't apply this policy to individual characters (Obi Wan, Luke, Darth Vader), then why can you apply it to ships, which were much less visually impressive in the OT.


Because we never saw a fleet battle, we never saw a Star destroyer go all out against an enemy.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 10:02 PM
Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
reborn_213
Scruffy Nerf Herder

Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Picking up some power converters.


 

Episode 6. Ackbar leads the Rebels against star destroyers when the Death Star shields are still up.


__________________

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 10:19 PM
Click here to Send reborn_213 a Private Message Find more posts by reborn_213 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: The Netherlands


 

And the Star Destroyers are ordered to stand down and wait...


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Mar 15th, 2006 10:35 PM
Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
REXXXX
Networking

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego

Moderator


 

Indeed. Episode VI is not a good example of fleet battles. ROTS provides the best fleet battle we see in Star Wars, for most of the space fights in ANH and ROTJ are heavily centered on the Millennium Falcon and X/Y/A/B-Wings. In ROTS, we actually take a look at cruiser vs. cruiser.

However, the SD and SSD dominate the PT ships. Grievous' flagship in comparison to an SSD is toast. And Grievous' flagship was probably the top of the Confederate Navy. The Republic Navy did not vary much from the original SD model, but the OT models are bound to be better, seeing as it is twenty years more of technological advances and such.

Go look up statistics on Wikipedia or the Databank.

Anyways, clonetroopers vs. stormtroopers & rebel commandos...hmm...while the clones have better training (it would seem), there are millions more stormtroopers, and throwing in the rebel troops is overkill.


__________________

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 12:40 AM
Click here to Send REXXXX a Private Message Find more posts by REXXXX Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth_Glentract
The Truest Sith Lord

Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Korriban


 

The OT army pwns. Even if the Confederacy had 20 of GG's flagship it couldn't take down a single SSD.


__________________
http://darthglentract.tripod.com/index.html Go Jawa's!!

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 12:57 AM
Click here to Send Darth_Glentract a Private Message Find more posts by Darth_Glentract Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
REXXXX
Networking

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego

Moderator


 

Not that Grievous' flagship is all that great. It gets knocked out pretty easy, it seems.


__________________

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 01:00 AM
Click here to Send REXXXX a Private Message Find more posts by REXXXX Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
reborn_213
Scruffy Nerf Herder

Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Picking up some power converters.


 

I know guys, I was being sarcastic. I was poking fun at the fact that you guys say I can't use the 70's/80's technology as an excuse when it comes to individual characters (ie Luke, Obi Wan, and Vader), but you can use it for ships. I realize you haven't come out and said it, but the naval fights in the PT are much more impressive due to...anyone?...technology.


__________________

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 01:33 AM
Click here to Send reborn_213 a Private Message Find more posts by reborn_213 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
darthsith19
Arm-Wrestler

Registered: May 2005
Location: United States


 

tie


__________________

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 03:24 AM
Click here to Send darthsith19 a Private Message Find more posts by darthsith19 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
REXXXX
Networking

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego

Moderator


 

Err...you can't use it as an excuse for anything, in-universe. When it comes to the movies themselves, then yes, of course you can use it. But movie-making technology is highly irrelevant to in-universe.

The naval fights are more impressive because in ROTJ...we don't look at the naval fights. In fact, I don't remember even seeing a Star Destroyer fire shots at a Mon Calamari cruiser. The closest we get to naval fight is the very start of ANH.

And I mean cruisers and destroyers by naval fights. I dunno if starfighters apply.


__________________

Last edited by REXXXX on Mar 16th, 2006 at 03:45 AM

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 03:37 AM
Click here to Send REXXXX a Private Message Find more posts by REXXXX Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Xepeyon
Dark Helmet

Registered: Feb 2006
Location: United States


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by jollyjim311
I know guys, I was being sarcastic. I was poking fun at the fact that you guys say I can't use the 70's/80's technology as an excuse when it comes to individual characters (ie Luke, Obi Wan, and Vader), but you can use it for ships. I realize you haven't come out and said it, but the naval fights in the PT are much more impressive due to...anyone?...technology.


I Agree. The Galactic Civil War was far bloodier in space and on land. if it was up-to-date, it would be worse than ROTS.


__________________
I Find Your Lack Of Faith Disturbing...

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 03:47 AM
Click here to Send Xepeyon a Private Message Find more posts by Xepeyon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Lord Lucien
Lets all love Lain

Registered: Jul 2005
Location:


 

I was wondering when someone would create a thread like this, I would have done it, but then again... the answer was obvious.


__________________
Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 06:47 AM
Click here to Send Lord Lucien a Private Message Find more posts by Lord Lucien Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
PurpleSaber
Vaapad Master

Registered: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, California


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by jollyjim311
I know guys, I was being sarcastic. I was poking fun at the fact that you guys say I can't use the 70's/80's technology as an excuse when it comes to individual characters (ie Luke, Obi Wan, and Vader), but you can use it for ships. I realize you haven't come out and said it, but the naval fights in the PT are much more impressive due to...anyone?...technology.

The ships are better in the OT, because GL said they had better technology than in the PT. We never actually saw the ships fight in a real battle, so we can't say that they suck. The lightsaber duels are bad, because...
1. Visually, they are slow and unimpressive. (Plus Luke's baseball bat swing).
2. GL has even stated that PT guys were better. I can't remember the exact quote but he said something along the lines of "the only people we see fight in 4,5, and 6 is an old man, a farmboy, and a cyborg. The PT is lightsaber dueling at its prime." He said something like that.


__________________

I'm so proud of myself. I made my own sig! stick out tongue

Old Post Mar 17th, 2006 04:44 AM
Click here to Send PurpleSaber a Private Message Find more posts by PurpleSaber Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth Subjekt
The beginning of the end.

Registered: Oct 2004
Location: On cloud 9 in 7th heaven! I didn't


 

even though I prefer the OT to the PT, the PT takes this one.

Not only do they have the clones, but ALL those battle droids and super battle droids. The OT has the DS, which Luke piloted and destroyed, but Anakin was a far better pilot, and ONE single ship took out the SSD by flying through the main control room...send a droid who has no knowledge of suicide and do it again. Plus ALL the jedi and the amount of Sith...the OT couldn't survive. In those terms you're talking, 3 OB1's, 3 Sidious, 2 1/2 Anakins, so on and so forth. At least thats the way I interrupt it. All the characters in the OT that are in the PT are younger and more lively.

So I hate to say it, really, but PT owns.


__________________

Thanks to Advent for the Sig!

Old Post Mar 17th, 2006 05:02 AM
Click here to Send Darth Subjekt a Private Message Find more posts by Darth Subjekt Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Generic Hero
KGB

Registered: Jan 2006
Location:


 

I don't see anything in the PT standing against 25,000 ISDs. One single ISD is bigger than anything in the PT, with more turbolaser batteries and turrets.

Old Post Mar 17th, 2006 05:05 AM
Click here to Send Generic Hero a Private Message Find more posts by Generic Hero Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 12:55 AM.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< Contact Us - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Forum powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.