Gender: Male
Location: The Grand Vestibule

__________________

My MySpace SaTsu's Sketchbook My Deviant Art

Gender: Female
Location: May or may not be somewhere else.

__________________

HIS force be with you.

Gender: Female
Location:

Moderator

Half of me was reluctant to write this letter out of concern that Mr. Raz may be one of those people who say rancorous things for the sole purpose of gaining attention. What I have to say will probably provoke a response from Mr. Raz. He may label me "snivelling" or even "snooty". I realize and accept that as a consequence of what I am about to say. However, I certainly hope that Raz will read everything I have to say before labeling me. But given Raz's track record, I have concluded that his helpers are the biggest sadistic, intolerant theologasters who have ever dirtied the face of the earth, so I've decided to proceed. Let's get down to business: If we don't search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically virulent ones championed by the most featherbrained pikers I've ever seen, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Raz's sympathizers have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times -- stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize Raz's directionless Ponzi schemes. It is not a pretty sight. He can't seriously believe that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to his demands, can he? I've never gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from Raz. But what is clear is that the gloss that his helots put on his slogans unfortunately does little to declare a truce with Raz and commence a dialogue. That's our situation today, in very rough outline. Of course, I've left out a thousand details and refinements and qualifications. I've not mentioned that those who cover up Mr. Raz's criminal ineptitude do us all a great injustice. And I've ignored Dadaism altogether. I've simply pointed out one key fact: He is eating our lunch.

Instead of focusing on why Raz is a small dollop of pond scum masquerading as a man, I would like to remind people that letting Raz destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system sends a clear message to namby-pamby hatemongers that they can get on my nerves. The logical consequences of that are clear: Raz has completely stepped off the deep end. I'll say that again, because I want it to sink in: We cannot and we must not allow ourselves to become infected with the fatal germs of defeatism. With an enormous expenditure of words, unclear in content and incomprehensible as to meaning, he frequently stammers an endless hodgepodge of phrases purportedly as witty as in reality they are wretched. Only soulless malingerers can feel at home in this maze of reasoning and cull an "inner experience" from this dung heap of jaundiced, bleeding-heart solipsism. That's all I'm going to say in this letter, because if I were to write everything I want to write, I'd be here all night.




Ceterum censeo OTF esse delendam.

__________________

Gender: Male
Location: The Grand Vestibule

__________________

My MySpace SaTsu's Sketchbook My Deviant Art

Gender: Male
Location: Cell 88

Account Restricted

At times, we all have an axe to grind. Currently, I'm grinding my axe in regards to Mr. George W. Bush's protests. Let me begin by saying that it's easy for us to shake our heads at Bush's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity. It's easy for us to say, "Bush will stop at nothing to get his way." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because Bush has remarked that honor counts for nothing. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand, I'll spell it out for you. For starters, Bush's solutions defy common sense. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that it strikes me as amusing that he complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! Bush does nothing but complain. So, Bush, maybe the problem is not with bestial doofuses, but with you. Since most people oppose his prissy equivocations, Bush has had to tear down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation using every impertinent means imaginable. Our battle with him is a battle between spiritualism and fascism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that it's our responsibility to rise to the challenge of thwarting Bush's lackluster plans. That's the first step in trying to give our propaganda fighters an instrument that is very much needed at this time, and it's the only way to deal summarily with blasphemous slobs. Lest you think that I'm talking out of my hat here, I should point out that any rational argument must acknowledge this. Bush's mischievous histrionics, naturally, do not. I would like to end on a heartfelt note. It can plausibly be surmised that the grossly fallacious reasoning behind Mr. George W. Bush's refrains can be confirmed by some simple fact-checking.


I've seen a number of deluded and wayward things over the years, but Bush administration's offhand remarks really take the cake. By way of introduction, let me just say that Bush administration claims to be supportive of my plan to defy the international enslavement of entire peoples. Don't trust it, though; it's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, it'll dismantle the guard rails that protect society from the prurient elements in its midst. Not only that, but only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that Bush administration is like a parrot that makes noises for attention without any kind of clue as to what it is saying. I challenge it to move from its broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. Do not let inflammatory rhetoric and misleading and inaccurate statements decide your position on this issue. Yes, Bush administration may have some superficial charm, but it is absolutely determined to believe that its perorations enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness, and it's not about to let facts or reason get in its way. Bush administration somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that children should belong to the state. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. Bush administration's foot soldiers are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Bush administration, who wants nothing less than to make our lives miserable. This letter has gone on far too long, in my opinion, and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that Bush administration is greatly increasing the size of its insincere faction by needling and wheedling poxy riffraff into it.

__________________

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Gender: Male
Location: Sailing the seas of cheese.

I didn't even read it all.


Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that Princess Lea George Lucas Organa, Esq.'s idea of addressing a problem is not to fix the problem but to establish a task force, council, or commission to look into it, study it, dissect it, and finally talk it to death? If you've ever wondered about the answer to that question, then read on. By way of introduction, let me just say that Lea talks a lot about neopaganism and how wonderful it is. However, she's never actually defined what it means. How can she argue for something she's never defined? On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that her faithfuls like having a stamp of assurance from her that what they're doing is fashionable, or at least acceptable. But upon further investigation, one will find that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Lea's laughable excuses. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Lea's asseverations have become. Prevent us from recognizing the vast and incomparable achievements, contributions, and discoveries that are the product of our culture if you like, Lea, because I simply don't care. Her forces do not concern themselves much with the people around them. Of course, it's not that simple.

Jingoism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. I have the following advice for Lea: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. Yes, Virginia, her claim that we ought to worship disgusting sandbaggers as folk heroes is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. She is leading us down a slippery slope of economic strife, social turmoil, cultural chaos, and unpleasant sexism. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Lea does, and that's why the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how presumptuous and unruly she has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see a statistical study of Lea's capacity to learn the obvious. Also worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many reprehensible lounge lizards realize that when it comes to Lea's metanarratives, I claim that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to lead her out of a dream world and back to hard reality. The sooner we do that, the better, because I should note that if you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, the thought that someone, somewhere, might raise maledicent, headlong saboteurs out of their cultural misery and lead them to the national community as a valuable, united factor is anathema to her. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, if a cogent, logical argument entered Lea's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. I need your help if I'm ever to develop a rational-empirical base for dialogue about Lea's wisecracks. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, today, we might have let Lea turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will arraign Lea at the tribunal of public opinion.

So let me make it clear that Lea demands obeisance from her votaries. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Lea forces them to condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable. This seems so obvious, I am amazed there is even any discussion about it. I frequently talk about how she is a bacillus in the audacious gut of imperialism. I would drop the subject, except that if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. She provides none. By that, I mean not only in the strictest sense, but also the whole spectrum of related meanings. I don't just assert that Lea disguises her iron fist with a velvet glove; I can back that up with facts. For instance, I cannot promise not to be angry at Lea. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Lea -- to pollute the great canon of English literature with references to her soulless plans for the future.

I alluded to this earlier, but I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Lea that ignorance is bliss. This may be why her adherents are generally all smiles. Her occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Lea's promises. In fact, she receives most of her knowledge from "Deconstructionism for Dummies". I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that if she bites me, I will doubtlessly bite back. You've never heard that Lea's intention is to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks? That's because her cheerleaders have been staging a massive cover-up for quite some time now. But if you keep your eyes open, you'll notice that I don't see how she can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong.

Lea's retinue is reminiscent of the French Jacobin Club and its morbid obsession with power, death, and careerism. And let us not forget that Lea had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, she gave us nihilism, isolationism, and revisionism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still contend that it is up to each of us to establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Lea is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to end Lea's control over the minds and souls of countless people. We have an obligation to make a cause célèbre out of exposing her allegations for what they really are. And we have an obligation to refute her arguments line by line and claim by claim. She is hooked on designer victimology but fails to notice the real victims: the entire next generation. And that's what writing this sort of letter is all about. It's a way to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by Princess Lea George Lucas Organa, Esq. and her proxies.

__________________