The fight takes place in the city of Rio at dusk. The city is completely deserted of all forms of life but the city is otherwise running at normal capacity.
Scenarios
1. Standard fight between each. No prep-time, no blood-lust, standard equipment and only the knowledge they already have on each other.
2. Blade gets prep-time (one month), blood-lust is on for Blade and Wolverine is otherwise limited to Scenario 1.
3. Same as Scenario 2 except Wolverine is blood-lusted.
Note
Please back up all claims with evidence. Don't just say Wolverine wins or Blade wins unless you explain why and can provide scans and feats to prove this.
And Blade was using an Adamantium sword when he was with Spitfire and the rest of the blokes over in England.
I'm not supporting either side, just enforcing that real reasoning, evidence and feats are being used by both sides to prove their stand points on this fight.
It's a great fight, and Blade is arguably around the same skill level as Logan, but Logan is designed to not lose fights like this....unless we give Blade the handle of the Muramasa Blade and he gets a lucky tap on Logan's forehead.
1. Wolverine. Superior feats, he can tank everything Blade throws at him long enough to go for a kill.
2/3 - Blade would try to turn him into a vampire and it's a bad idea 'cause:
- vampire Logan becomes stronger and faster
- as long as there is HF in his blood, he'll heal from vampirism (and quite swiftly as seen in Gischler's run), so stake to the heart is not gonna end him.
King was joking. Y'see, Romulus knocked out Logan with the hilt of muramasa blade, typical wtf moment from Way's run.
Wasn't that tactic what helped attribute that the fight between Wolverine and Blade was poorly written when S.H.I.E.L.D. sent him to hunt Logan down?
I remember reading that. Was kind of stupid.
And so people aren't thinking I'm just being contrary or "stupid", I'm just beating around the bush until people start posting Blade and Wolverine feats so they can be definitively stacked against one another. It helps prove the outcome of a fight more succinctly then just saying "He wins because I say he's better".
They are both low superhuman, but Wolverine's has had much more appearances and thus better feats.
Let's look at strength ones for example. Logan broke from Ursa Major's hold, was swimming and climbing with a piano attached to him, used a tree as a club, kept the freight car from separating from the rest of the train, a pickup truck didn't even knock him on his ass (apparently he had to be bracing prior to getting hit)...
Is there a Blade feat that can be compared with those? I think not, but I'll copy and paste the post from his respect thread anyway.
Yeah, but what else would Blade do with prep? He seems to believe it would work on Logan.
Yes, I can see what you're doing here. You're right of course, just don't expect many responses 'cause a) it's been done to the death b) KMC is unfamiliar with Eric Brooks
The most impressive of those strength feats were the ones concerning Spider-man. Do we know exactly how physically strong that vampire was, because Spider-man clearly outclasses any vampires (even Varnae) by a large margin.
But Wolverine most certainly has the better strength feats, especially breaking free from being grappled by a Class 15 character.
Not exactly sure. As said, I'm playing more a facilitator role then a debater for either side.
It is a shame that people don't bother to learn characters' names.
And I have come across multiple Blade v. Wolverine threads but all of them were more or less what I am avoiding with this thread. A lot of claims and opinions but no hard evidence.
So, moving on: We've proved that Wolverine has the strength advantage over Blade, but what about combat skill, speed and reflexes and durability?
--
It's even more obvious which character is more durable out of the two... Wolverine heals extremely fast, has ridiculous damage soak... Blade just doesn't operate on that level. I think it's common knowledge.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 15th, 2011 06:05 AM
