Xi Jingping and Barack Obama have agreed to "take new steps to address cybercrime." While we're not at the point where anything concrete has been laid down, this is a positive step as China is finally willing to recognize that there is trade espionage going on. What surprises me is that the agreement would not cover more traditional national security-related cyber espionage, which you'd think the Chinese would be more willing to talk about as they have less plausible deniability than with espionage where the Chinese act on behalf of Chinese tech firms when stealing from American companies.
Let's hope the Chinese are willing to engage frankly on this matter.
Obama was pretty direct regarding what would happen if China didn't change its ways.
__________________
“Where the longleaf pines are whispering
to him who loved them so.
Where the faint murmurs now dwindling
echo o’er tide and shore."
-A Grave Epitaph in Santa Rosa County, Florida; I wish I could remember the man's name.
this seems like good news but im sure by the end of this page we'll find out that this is once again proof that obama has begun his coup to make himself forever-emperor of earth and enslave white people.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
What would sanctions do to decrease these crimes? Even if sanctions were slapped on China, how would that stop these things from happening? Many hackers are individuals that work outside of their nations policies, and for their own gain if I'm not mistaken. The cloud may be one of the only things that can truly be said to be perfectly flawed. There are also many levels of cyber espionage. People that live in the US itself may be physically involved by means of social engineering in order to leak sensitive information. Obama can say whatever he wants to, and slap whatever sanctions on China that he wants to, but this problem will not get any better... It may just make matters worse.
If it's a case of rogue individuals and the Chinese government/people start suffering due to sanctions, they'll crack down on hackers on their own soil. Will this stop 100% of them? No. But fewer is better.
That's not what I'm saying. What I am saying is that the solution to the problem is wrong. We need to come up with better encryption and a means of truly tracking hackers by using the same methods that they use to logically get their hands on sensitive information. Quantum encryption alone, is not the way to go. We have to somehow come up with a means of attaching a token to every signal being sent. Then there is the real possibility of social engineering being responsible for many of the root causes to these data breaches. Sanctions alone will not work. The US needs to work on its physical and logical infrastructure, and I suggest that we begin with dismantling antiquated physical structures that are vulnerable to physical attack, and work forward from there.
Obama invites the Hacker himself into the White House. Hope the secret service took BO blackberry. Cause we all know he's got one, that he refused to give up.
On a serious note Obama won't so shit if they hack us. Just like he didn't do shit against Putin propping up Assad, and didn't do anything against Russians advances in Ukraine.
He's handing off the problems to the next president who will just have the Obama blame card ready and then 8 more years or blaming Obama and Bush for the worlds problems.
Quit electing idiots maybe?
He should stick to what he knows best, Punishing Germans.
__________________
In order for any life to matter, we all have to matter
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I don't know man, I don't think Sinbad would make a good Borg victim. Just picture Sinbad as a Borg.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
On a more serious note, we really have to come up with a means of using the power of encryption to aggressively counter hack attempts. Instead of using firewall technology to deflect, it should be used to also attack.
Well actually I was more just joking I did get what you were trying to say..I just like the Borg :/
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I actually thought that you were making fun of me as well. I studied IT security and scored pretty high on my exams. My opinion on this particular subject came before doing a search. This is what was stated, and my opinion runs in line with the person writing this paper.
--------------------------------------------
Check this out
--------------------------------------------
"In the past twenty years, the quantum properties of matter and light have been applied to the field of information security. Research ha
s advanced to the point that actual devices using quantum properties are transmitting information over considerable distances. At this time, transmission speeds and hardware expense have generally limited the use of quantum devices to distribute keys rather than entire messages. There is controversy about how secure quantum messages are. It is possible to prove that the probability of message interception by an adversary is arbitrarily small, under ideal conditions. People and machines, however, can never be perfect, so there are many approaches to defeating quantum encryption. Some computer security experts have wondered why making the strongest link in a system even stronger will improve security overall. Since public key cryptography is so hard to decipher now, why spend so much time and money on an even more secure quantum encryption scheme? If deciphering is nearly impossible, why not use other techniques, such as social engineering, to eavesdrop?".
i was under the impression that the united states and china are more or less mutually dependent on one another for their respective economies not to tank
i understand sanctions on iran or russia... the US can surely afford to try to cripple these economies without suffering too much collateral
but i was under the impression that if we were to cease trade with china, or even if their economy took a serious hit, then ours would as well
as far as i know, china is more dependent on the US than vice versa... but they are still our number one trading partner and source of cheap manufacturing.
this is an open question to anyone who knows about this sort of thing... cause my knowledge is somewhat limited: what kind of sanctions can obama use on china that wouldn't adversely affect our own economy?
note that i understand the intent is not to use sanctions but to goad china into cooperating by threatening them. but i'm asking about what could be done if they decided not to.
__________________
Last edited by red g jacks on Sep 25th, 2015 at 11:59 PM
KMC Community Forums
Sep 25th, 2015 08:34 PM
