__________________ Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.
Btw, I don't expect for liberals to be swayed or admit that this is true but it's not really necessary for them to either. Because we all still know it's true whether they admit it or not.
__________________ Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.
Last edited by Star428 on Nov 1st, 2015 at 08:24 AM
*sigh*... Did you just come in here to troll me, riv? That's not like you at all. Perhaps O'Reilly touched a nerve with you and the butthurt is killing you?
Trolling has never been something I've known you to do. Starting to lose respect for you now. Look, I didn't make this thread to get into a mud-slinging or name-calling match with libs (which is where it'll most certainly lead to if I argue with them). I made it so those of us who haven't been infected with progressiveism can learn the truth for ourselves. I knew it wouldn't sway Liberals but that wasn't my intention anyway and yeah ,I"ve no interest in arguing with any of you about this because I've seen how liberals have repeatedly ignored evidence right in front of them. Like I've said in a previous thread, they would argue that shit doesn't stink just for the sake of being argumentative.
__________________ Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.
Last edited by Star428 on Nov 1st, 2015 at 12:27 PM
Making an educated guess as to your intentions based on your OPs wording, and your behavior in similarly themed threads, is hardly trolling, Star.
I wouldnt have even posted to this, except that the site is slow this morning, and i was mildly curious how you'd take good natured critisism from someone who doesnt habitually argue with you.
Your immediately falling back on MB buzz words, and again (as in your OP) all but saying anyone who disagrees with you is flat out wrong, and you WILL argue with them, is my answer.
This video listens as a story narrative than it does as any kind of credible fact based news.
Bill throws out one number. A viewer voted number. He ignores other numbers like Fox is often rated lower in stating actual facts than most other news networks. That their viewership is often one of the most miss informed demographics in America.
This piece is a story driven narrative that simply throws out accusations and tries to enforce Fox news typical viewer's belief system. It's a fluff piece.
My problem with Bill is that sometimes he actually makes some good points. The reason this is a problem is because he also says a lot of stupid shit and thus the few good points he made tend to get overlooked.
He also tends to not use logic. Like was upset that guy went on Fox and then trashed Fox..and then said "perhaps he made a verbal mistake". Wait, what? So he "accidentally" trashed Fox? I'm sure it was meant to be sarcasm but it just comes off as silly.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Last edited by Surtur on Nov 1st, 2015 at 04:39 PM
It's often somewhat along partisan lines, and some groups seem to distrust most simply because they're media outlets... but the top ones have only minor distrust on any side.
And I'll also note you'll occasionally see Time and Star passing around stories from blog sites that don't even make that list *at all* as if they were absolute fact.
On anything on the list, I'd tentatively accept a story, though I'd definitely fact-check the lower ones.
Bill is really just a shill for the RINO party nowadays anyway. Which makes Fox just as bad and untrustworthy as CNN and the other pack of Liberal Liar News networks.
__________________ Banned 30 days for the Crime of "ETC"... and when I "ETC" I do it HARD!!!
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Poor Buzzfeed
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
LOL. O'Reilly is not a RINO. I don't know where you get that preposterous notion from. And FOX is the only station to trust now a days. Megan Kelly is the only one on FOX who MIGHT be a RINO and even that I"m not so sure about. She just doesn't like Trump, it seems.
__________________ Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.-Dr. David Berlinski, Philosophy
Most people believe Evolution not because they themselves are dumb, but cause they trust the "experts" who are feeding them evolutionary fast food, and so they don't bother questioning whether or not it's true.
Last edited by Star428 on Nov 1st, 2015 at 08:57 PM
Your Orgy Island story, had some blog sites repeating what a tabloid newspaper said.
You know, that is never gonna get old. You believe that there's a Clinton orgy island due to a tabloid.
It sums up in a nutshell how your standard of evidence is based entirely on how much you dislike someone, and not if there's anything that would traditionally be considered a reliable source.