I know some hate it, but I'm fine with writers disregarding continuity if it improves the story. Remender's done it and gave us one of the best super hero series of the last 20 years. Hickman does it and is doing a good job with the X-Men. (The associated titles are kinda meh though.)
I don't want writers to feel enslaved to some status quo if there's a better tale to tell. Morrison's New X-Men was great because it flipped some major shit on it's head, for example.
Ideally, you get both continuity and good stories, but I'll generally take the story over fitting fan-site chronologies and character wikis.
(I'm not speaking for all Winick's work, but his Outsiders was a good read. It was conventional but enjoyable super-hero stuff, and he gave us Indigo, rest her soul.)
Last edited by StyleTime on Apr 15th, 2020 at 09:04 PM