especially chemicals which are used improperly, thus not even remotely effective in preventing tooth decay...thats like drinking preparation h to cure hemorrhoids
''Across the country and around the world, dentists are insisting that we drip fluoride into the public water supply. For what purpose? To protect the teeth? Can you be serious? People are swallowing this liquid. They're not rinsing it in their mouth and spitting it out, they're ingesting it. Now as a result we have fluorosis, and bone disorders that are related to the over-consumption of fluoride''
check that out
__________________
"How about this? Shut your mouth...Or I'll kick your teeth down your throat and shut it for you."
Regardless, scientists can spend any number of hours "trying" something and if they want to they can make numbers look anyway they want to in an attempt to justify their position.
Show me the levels of flouride required to have a signifcant toxic effect on the body as well as the effects of the residual toxicology reports.
I'd like to add also it's such an effective poison that average life span in the last hundred years has what doubled? It's doing a great job at limiting populations and lowering average life expectancies.
Last edited by Soleran on Sep 15th, 2006 at 02:51 AM
I knew all this back in the roaring 90s. Dave Matthews Band told me.
__________________ Full fathom five thy father lies;
Of his bones are coral made;
Those are pearls that were his eyes:
Nothing of him that doth fade
But doth suffer a sea-change
Into something rich and strange.
deano, since you're in a google research mood, look up studies of tooth decay per population of european states which have done away with fluoridizastion of tap water. i had a link a long time ago, and am too lazy to look again. point is its actually no different.
Does it matter, Deano isn't presenting this information to show us flouride is ineffective at fighting tooth decay, he's presenting material to say flouride is poison and what kind of message is that attempting to illustrate, certainly not that it's inefective at fighting cavities, huh.
Of course not he flat out quoted someone saying it is linked to higher rates of cancer (with alot of supporting evidence I might add.)
you know, you're just killing a valid topic because you dont like the thread starter (neither do i, but thats beside the point). dont make me post this in that special tactics thread
KMC Community Forums
Sep 14th, 2006 08:45 PM
