no you said go for about two yards I vividly described mine thus creating the ultimate pwnage upon the FS unless it happens to be someone like Brian Dawkins you better hope your WR can hold onto the ball then cause he will be nailed
It depends on how fast the FS is. How well the corner jams the reciever whihc I assmue he would in that scheme otherwise it is one on one down the sidelines generally not the best for a corner.
Gender: Male Location: Let The Rage Of Orgasm Drive You
Account Restricted
I like this one. Running backs pick up blitz and then go for short pass after. strong side WR cuts inside 5 yards. weak side WR cuts in after 10 then goes inward 5 yard then go post outside. TE post out and straight along the sidelines
Attachment: football.jpg
This has been downloaded 24 time(s).
__________________
You Are Loved
LET THE RAGE OF ORGASM DRIVE YOUR LIBIDO
The edited version of the running play wouldn't work the way you have the blocking set up. You should keep the LG pulling. Having him run through to get to the Safety would never work. If you've ever played football, the commotion of a play would never allow him to get to that Safety. You're taking him out of the play like that. Have the RT lead block instead of cracking back on the DT. The way this running play is designed, whether it be a Stretch or a Toss, that DT (unless EXTREMELY skilled) is not going to be able to get the the RB before he gets outside. Having the far side WR head towards the Safety is a good idea, but he usually won't get there in time, but you're ok because if you set your blocking up the way I explained you have three lead blockers (the pulling LG, the RT and the FB). RT picks up first man, LG picks up second man, and FB picks up third man. That would most likely be the LB, and the two Safeties. Touchdown every time.
__________________ Thanks to Pittman for the sig
"I don't care if I fall, as long as someone picks up my gun and keeps on shooting." -Ernesto Guevara.