ankur29
ankur
Gender: Male Location:
__________________
Oct 28th, 2007 04:40 PM
Digi
Forum Leader
Gender: Unspecified Location:
Moderator
Juggs isn't upright there. And Wolverine is shorter than anyone there...he shouldn't be equal with Pete, Bob and Norrin.
Not bad though.
__________________
Oct 28th, 2007 04:55 PM
ankur29
ankur
Gender: Male Location:
jugg upright woudl be hulk's height, and we all now that wolverine is not 5ft3 most of his images show him near pete's height etc i would say about 5ft6/7
__________________
Oct 28th, 2007 05:05 PM
Priest
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Asteroid M
Thor is defiantly the most strongest pound for pound.
Oct 28th, 2007 07:19 PM
Estacado
Legendary
Gender: Male Location: Soul Society
__________________
Bankai.
Oct 28th, 2007 07:30 PM
Rhinoceros
PM me for nudes ;)
Gender: Unspecified Location: Under Spidey's Fist.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Priest
Thor is defiantly the most strongest pound for pound.
No he's not, take a look at Hercules' strenght/weight ratio.
__________________
"Don't you know who I am? He must not know who I am! I'm The Ju.. Eh, Rhino! B*tch!"
Oct 28th, 2007 08:01 PM
ankur29
ankur
Gender: Male Location:
__________________
Last edited by ankur29 on Nov 1st, 2007 at 11:24 PM
Nov 1st, 2007 11:20 PM
Dum Dum Dugan
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
no wolverine is diffiently 5'3
kitty pryde is taller then him lol
Nov 2nd, 2007 12:32 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Battlehammer
no wolverine is diffiently 5'3
kitty pryde is taller then him lol
yeah but he is often drawn to be about 5'8 - 5'9
also, in the movies, he was 6'3
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Nov 2nd, 2007 12:41 AM
Dum Dum Dugan
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Master-Borg
yeah but he is often drawn to be about 5'8 - 5'9
also, in the movies, he was 6'3
some times, but he often shown as smaller as well.
ya well it a movie. not many famous 5'3 actors that are male lol
Nov 2nd, 2007 12:50 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Battlehammer
ya well it a movie. not many famous 5'3 actors that are male lol
true...but they didn't have to pick a giant (Hugh Jackman), there are many average to short guys in hollywood
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Nov 2nd, 2007 12:51 AM
Dum Dum Dugan
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Master-Borg
true...but they didn't have to pick a giant (Hugh Jackman), there are many average to short guys in hollywood
that would look like wolverine. Not really.
also if your not going to get a 5'3 wolverine why bother picking ators for there height.
..........also the movie was extremely inaccurate the hieghts was the least of which
Nov 2nd, 2007 12:53 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Battlehammer
also if your not going to get a 5'3 wolverine why bother picking ators for there height.
because being short is a KEY CHARACTERISTIC of what makes Wolverine stand out. its very important to the portrayal of his character...he's always been called a runt.
most superheroes are 6'2 or above, a few are 5'10...but Logan is 5'3...I think it was an IMPORTANT feature for the creators to his character.
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Nov 2nd, 2007 12:56 AM
Dum Dum Dugan
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Master-Borg
because being short is a KEY CHARACTERISTIC of what makes Wolverine stand out. its very important to the portrayal of his character...he's always been called a runt.
most superheroes are 6'2 or above, a few are 5'10...but Logan is 5'3...I think it was an IMPORTANT feature for the creators to his character.
not really when the entire movie was completely inaccurate.
There was a lot more important things wrong with the movie then logan hieghts.
do you want me to name them all?
Nov 2nd, 2007 01:03 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Battlehammer
not really when the entire movie was completely inaccurate.
There was a lot more important things wrong with the movie then logan hieghts.
do you want me to name them all?
no not really, i dont care what other inaccuracies it had...it doesn't make it right for them to make Logan 6'3
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Nov 2nd, 2007 01:04 AM
Dum Dum Dugan
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Master-Borg
no not really, i dont care what other inaccuracies it had...it doesn't make it right for them to make Logan 6'3
who cares that was the least of the movies problems.
I mean for one his sabertooth origin was completely off.
He was shown with little to no MA skill.
He was shown with only human strength.
man I could go on and on.
Nov 2nd, 2007 01:06 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Battlehammer
He was shown with only human strength.
only human strength? he threw Logan like 30 feet with one hand
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Nov 2nd, 2007 01:07 AM
Dum Dum Dugan
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Master-Borg
only human strength? he threw Logan like 30 feet with one hand
your talking about the second movie in which he throw those to solider like 3 feet..........
he was also shown to struggle with a human soldier in strength..............
He had to actauly try in cage fight...............verse a normal guy.
it was pathetic how his strength,speed,agility,skills and so forth were all portrayed
Nov 2nd, 2007 01:10 AM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version