quote: (post)

Originally posted by skygunner41
Thor is nothing without his hammer.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Eel O'Brien
Since he has come to rely on his hammer as part of his standard offense, he would definitely be set back without it.

However, he has shown that most (if not all) of his power is actually in him, and he would still have strength in the CM/BA class, so he would still be near the top of the ladder even w/out Mjolnir.

Since the OP mentioned it, I don't think he would do very well against Superman w/out his hammer but he would still do better than most other herald-levelers.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
There is no Godblast without Mjonlnir so that is an extreme offensive setback.

He can control the elements without Mjolnir so that is not a problem.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Eel O'Brien
Since he has come to rely on his hammer as part of his standard offense, he would definitely be set back without it.

However, he has shown that most (if not all) of his power is actually in him, and he would still have strength in the CM/BA class, so he would still be near the top of the ladder even w/out Mjolnir.

Since the OP mentioned it, I don't think he would do very well against Superman w/out his hammer but he would still do better than most other herald-levelers.

quote:

Ya your right he only killed THing,Hulk with his bare hands then finished off captain american and wolverine. With no hammer lol

quote: (post)

Originally posted by skygunner41
Thor is nothing without his hammer.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Philosophía
Irony.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Sado22
brute strength, thor is equal to hulk as is a proven fact. with all the stuff he can pull off, thor can and has oneshotted hulk.

btw, exactly when did this happen? i read this before but i can't remember what it was called. oh and thor did it with his bare HAND not hands

quote: (post)

Originally posted by UKR
Think about it...great unarmed fighter, has 100+ strength & durability. Even without his hammer he should be as powerful as Hercules. IIRC, didn't the Scion of Asgard use to fight the Hulk while unarmed? Why would he be weaker than Superman in a brawl? Same strength and durability...Superman usually forgets his speed...laser-vision obviously means nothing. Why would Superman pwn him? Wouldn't Thor with his hammer make it the reverse, since it's actually a weapon? Also, wouldn't using a weapon against an unarmed foe violate Asgardian warrior honor or something? So Thor's been using his hammer on unarmed enemies for about 47 years...

quote: (post)

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Ya your right he only killed THing,Hulk with his bare hands then finished off captain american and wolverine. With no hammer lol

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
Without Thor's hammer he can't fly.
Superman bfrs him. Thus Superman 10/10

banning bfr, Superman is astronomically stronger and faster than Thor with much greater blunt force durability (by best feats). So Superman still 10/10

With that said,
I've seen Thor countless of times been hit in the face and was made to drop his hammer. This is a big weakness of his.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by psycho gundam
and that's why superman put up a major effort to put him down in that cross-over right?

thor held back more than superman did.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by psycho gundam
when thor really wants stuff done, his fights look nothing like the one he had with superman.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by psycho gundam
when thor really wants stuff done, his fights look nothing like the one he had with superman.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by quanchi112
I think Thor is super pissed avenging a loss. I think if he met Superman again it would go down differently.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by skygunner41
this time though not eleven but 52.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by quanchi112
Huh?