"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
No, he really isn't. The fact that you are saying that is pretty much proving how O'Reilly (who is totally insane) has managed to convince people that he actually is reasonable. The fact that O'Reilly has influence among moderates and hyper-conservatives alike makes him much more dangerous.
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
No, you're who you are now. If the situation was given to you, and along came a chance for you to be personally involved in the destruction of Israel, would you partake? Whether it be a commander of an operation, and intelligence operative, a soldier with a rifle, or whatever. Would you be willing to include yourself in that country's destruction? Or at the very least, do you want it to be destroyed?
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
Here's a better question: why are you asking me this? Do you think that you're probing my inner psyche? Or do you think that you're deconstructing an Internet persona of false bravado that I put on when I'm online? Do you hope to ensnare me in a statement and claim that I'm as bad as Hitler? Do you think you're going to use the Socratic Method on me to awaken me to some fundamental truth?
__________________ Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
That's because Glenn Beck has more appeal to the ULTRA FAR RIGHT. Bill has appeal to both far right kooks, and moderate republicans. That's what makes him worse.
Do you think this is counts as dodging the question? I'm curious, I like to hear people's reasons. So what would you do?
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
Glenn Beck is a figurehead around a movement that is becoming a major political force. A movement largely consisting of easily-manipulated retards who jump at the word "socialism." A movement of suckers destined to feed corporations.
O'Reilly is somewhere in the background doing nothing.
I would dismantle Israel as a country if I could, though I wouldn't destroy its people. Alternatively, I would forcibly institute a two-state system and bitchslap any dissenters.
__________________ Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
25% of americans watch Fox, of which O'Reilly is by far the most popular program. Tea Partiers, while no exact number for how many exist, I see nothing indicating they even come close to approaching that number. Just because they make a lot of noise doesn't change the fact that often times it is actually the people in the background that make the most difference. Especially when the tea party has so far failed to meet expectations in their performances in midterms.
O'Reilly is in the background driving all republicans farther to the right... Glenn Beck is on the foreground doing nothing but speaking to an audience that has ideas identical to his own and thus are not creating change in their system of values.
EDIT: Lol, I actually did find a statistic for americans in the tea party after looking a bit more: 2%.
__________________
Last edited by King Kandy on Sep 2nd, 2010 at 06:53 AM
Wow. That's... that's a lot of people. 7 million or so.
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
At his peak, Glenn Beck had around 2.9 million viewers. O'Reilly's peak was around 3.1 million, I believe. There just isn't enough of a difference there to make me think that O'Reilly is more detrimental than Glenn Beck.
__________________ Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
Evidently you didn't realize, O'Reilly factor is shown twice a day while Glenn Beck is only shown once. Adding up both showings, O'Reilly has more viewers.
Because there are a lot of rich Jewish people in the USA who "Lobby" the government (give em money (bribe them)).
The problem is, if the USA would totally stop helping Israel, they´d get slaughtered in a very barbaric manner.
One could argue that they shouldn´t be there in the first place, taking over Palastine using terrorist tactics & now giving the Palastinians gip for trying the same thing to get it back.
But the generation which is there, normal working families with children etc. Do they deserve to get slaughtered, heads cut off and all that sort of sick thing some wrathfull Muslims participate in, just for being born in the wrong place at a bad time?
Should the USA take more interest in itself, by doing things like pumping the money into alternative energy to bring the country into a new technological era, instead of invading places based on lies.
I don´t know to be honest, If I was a US citizen I´d rather have more dollars in my pocket due to less tax. And let things abroad take their natural course.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 2nd, 2010 03:49 AM
