He wasn't right because you say so? Right... Yes, his might isn't strength but his overall power, not contradiction, till now both Thanos and Warlock are both right and you wrong. Simple.
The proof is in the statement which is still > your opinion, sorry to disappoint you.
Because you are angry or grumpy, or call it as you want. I backed my argument with the comic, you with your assumptions.
I will wait till you show me a statement that says the Warrior Thanosi is not 4 times stronger. See, that's you way of "debating". The nonsense comes from you.
With less punches, but amped punches big difference, this is about physical strength not power. There is your prove.
__________________
Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot
So no proof again, kinda what i expected when you dont have a leg to stand on .
Warrior clone had trouble koing Dr Strange with him strength.
If Warlock is right about assuming Thanos strength lvl which he used as a comparison to Warriors strength you will have no trouble of showing Warlock taking Thanos punches will you.
I will take the statement of the creator of the clones over someone guessing any day.
How do ignore the comic? Warlcok was guessing as he has never felt a punch from Thanos to compare strength unless you can show Thanos ever punching Warlock.
And? we aint talking about Hulk or a Hulk that is supposed to 4x as strong as Glads.
No but they are a direct comparison. Just like how Black Bolt physically held his own against Glads in WOK and how Thanos easily manhandled and punched BB in to the dirt.
I dont have as he states on panel that none of the clones exceed his own might and earlier he explains what the clones were disgned for each instance ie strength,telepathy etc.
wrong again its shown as a strength amp when he punched a whole through the dopplegangers chest by amping his strength.
we know you like to troll but at least know what youre talking about if youre gonna do it right
Warlock spend enough time with Thanos and knows him better then most. His words > yours.
And we don't talk about Warlock vs Thanos too...
BB was weakened and held his own against Glads isn't held his own against Warrior... cherry picking, yeah, right.
Yes you have. Might or Power != physical strength.
No, wrong again. Drax punched through Thanos too. The glowing fists give his punches an extra edge, he hits harder because of the extra energy amp. Anything else doesn't make any sense.
Ok, to each his own. I know it's futile to convince you, when you think you are right. So, you can have the last word. No offense and none taken.
__________________
Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot
No he's right, that's one of the dumbest lines of thinking I've ever read in a long time.
Using the Warrior clone to reason that Gladiator is around twice as strong as Thanos (Seriously WHAT THE F*CK?) when we have more logical comparisons against similar foes or beings on a certain level which indicate Thanos is much stronger and way more powerful then Gladiator?
I'm far from a fan of Thanos but the idea that Gladiator is even on par much less twice as strong is just bonkers.
The prevailing theory is that your stupidity wraps itself around you like a force-field and simply repels cars like a magnetic shield. It's like your superpower.
This had already pretty much settled any dispute there might have been in this thread about whether you qualify as an intelligent life form: (please log in to view the image)
Gladiator would need a really long time to takedown Thanos. Imo Thanos can win even with one hand. He is too durable for Gladiator. In other hands, with some punches he can do a lot damage to Karllak.
KMC Community Forums
Dec 8th, 2013 10:26 PM
.
