quote: (post)

Originally posted by Galan007
Yeah, that was neat.

I'm just talking about the scene you posted. Emma's like: "Z0MG!!!! Watch what the most powaful one of us can do with the space gem!!!111!1!!!"

Then he just.... Flies.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by carver9
Agreed but in issue 6, he did use the gem to punch a black hole inside of someone.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by leonidas
i've only barely been following war of the realms--i think it really sucks--so i'm not up on the MOST current loki. i guess if the current version is being shown less capable than the classic one, then maybe hulk can win. and are we giving hulk a gem in this...?

anyway, current, who cares? classic loki still wins this every time.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Galan007
^ Those threads didn't have Hulk, though.

Hulk can apparently punch versatility in its face.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Only when the 'specialist' is SO specialized, does it make a difference.
Flash, for example. All he does is speed.....but with forum rules as they are, he can trump many others who are more versatile than him.

But at this level, over the distance? Am surprised Carv suddenly doesn't support versatility, unlike in the Surfer/Doomsday thread and the Blue Marvel/WW thread....

quote: (post)

Originally posted by carver9
I agree with Phil. That's why people like Surfer, Beta Ray Bill and Stardust stomps any version of World Breaker Hulk's skull in.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by carver9
Are you implying the forum rules are bias towards only speed? If so, I agree.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Galan007
This scene was so laughably retarded.

She wanks Hulk like he can use the space gem to preform some sort of esoteric feat we've never seen before...But then all he does is fly, lol.

(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)

Wow... Super creative way to use the infinite power of the space gem there, Hulkie.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It's not a bias, it's fact.

There's a reason why militaries have been moving toward faster and faster weaponry. From hand held weapons, to slingshots,to arrows, to crossbows, to muskets, to rifles, to missiles, to ICBMs.....propellor driven planes to jet fighters.....speed is and always has been the primary driver of offensive weaponry.

You don't see fighters practicing to be slow, do you?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It's not a bias, it's fact.

There's a reason why militaries have been moving toward faster and faster weaponry. From hand held weapons, to slingshots,to arrows, to crossbows, to muskets, to rifles, to missiles, to ICBMs.....propellor driven planes to jet fighters.....speed is and always has been the primary driver of offensive weaponry.

You don't see fighters practicing to be slow, do you?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by carver9
So you mention speed but in the same post you mention versatility. The military isnt focusing on ONE weapon either. Even though speed is a factor, they are also trying to revolutionize the weaponry their weapons.

And yes, you are bias.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by darthgoober
Oh I don't think that's true at all. Yes speed is a big issue, but it's not like their primary goal is to have rapid firing hand held weapons and slingshots, what the military wants more than anything is to have a lot of options. They want the most efficient ways to bring down the enemy in any given situation whether it's high tech machine guns, napalm, poison gas, cruise missiles, EMPs, or anything else they manage to cook up.