I've already justified and stated why , if you can't bring up new material and then have to quote your-self then your not as good a debater as i thought.
Jesus... I agree with Fox partially on thsis one... though I really find calling a 15 year old disgusting is the best way to go about it... I don't think it's disgusting for her to want to experiment...
__________________
Thanks to Badwolf for the great sig!
anyways...since everyone else is giving there lifes story. I am actually 18, live by the same "pure" philosophy that Fox does (ie no drugs, no drink), dont get laid (but thats my choice because Ive had plenty of opportunity's *I have that whole wait till marriage philosophy*), got voted biggest class flirt however in my Senior year of High School...which just ended . College here I come! ummmm I have my 4 close/best friends, then I have my crowd of friends. My social skills are pretty good (lets put it this way: Other than my close friends if I ever told anyone else that I liked Comic Books, or spent my time in Comic Book debates they'd think I was lying )
Anything else I missed? eh anything else has escaped my mind.
Sorry, I don't agree with the "disgusting part". I simplay disagree with young sex. and dyslexic posting is a seriously uncalled for insult, especially after you'd had a go at Grey fox for simply calling someone "disgusting". dyselxia's a condition, not a DAMN insult!
__________________
Thanks to Badwolf for the great sig!
actually, there are several moral philosophies that would justify GF's opinion.
(before i go into ethics, let me just say that he has EVERY right to say whatever he feels about any issue. Freedom of speech and all that, and if someone who owns, or represents someone who owns, this site decides it is inappropriate, that is their call. While it might not be nice, dissallowing someone to voice their opinion or to dissent from what others are saying is MUCH closer to fascism than having ANY opinion. Notice i didnt say anything about Nazis. Thats because the only people in history that are even remotely comparable to the nazis are..... THE NAZIS)
Kantian moral philosophy - Catagorical imperative says that an action is moral if it can be applied equally to all members of society. Since it is not hard to imagine people at 12-15 years of age being ill prepared for sexual conduct, it is therefore not proper for them to engage in such.
Virtue Based - a) sex and virginity is sacred to an individual and should be kept until the proper time b) a higher power (god or something else) has determined it is virtuous to not engage in sexual conduct
Empirical - Modern society (as opposed to the ones where girls were married of at 9-12) has a increadably long period allocated to the social and cognitive development of a child. Also, there is a great deal of neurological literature that shows the human brain has not fully developed the ability to make reasonable descisions until as late as 25. Given that today, as opposed to years ago, a person of 15 years of age is for all extents and puropses still an immature child (ie, still developing socially and physiologically) it is probably not adviseable from them to engage in actions that are known to be deeply confusing to their mental state.
to make it clear, I agree with none of these. My personal philosophy is anti-pure. in fact, i would look at living a pure life as disgusting and a waste. However that is my opinion, which brings me to my last point...
Regardless of age or any other factor, the only person who knows what is good for someone is themselves. Is it disgusting for a 10 year old to have sex, maybe, depends on how you look at the world. It doesn't matter what other people thing though, if you are a sexually aware and secure 10 year old, then do it, if you get hurt really bad because of it, thats the only way you are going to learn.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 3rd, 2006 04:51 PM
)
