KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book Movies » Comic Books » Pre-retcon Amalgam Brothers discussion

Pre-retcon Amalgam Brothers discussion
Started by: Thanos_THOTU

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (9): « First ... « 3 4 [5] 6 7 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Astner
The Ghost Who Walks

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
.

Can TOAA, (absolutely omnipotent/omniscient within Marvel),

create a boulder so heavy that he could not lift it?



Either way you answer proves that omnipotence in the literal sense is an impossibility, (even within comic-dom).

One of those omnipotent paradoxes would be the answer for that.
Can a Omnipotent being create a stone so heavy he cannot lift it?
Can he make himself more powerful?
Ect.

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 08:48 PM
Astner is currently offline Click here to Send Astner a Private Message Find more posts by Astner Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
One of those omnipotent paradoxes would be the answer for that.
Can a Omnipotent being create a stone so heavy he cannot lift it?
Can he make himself more powerful?
Ect.
Well if a "truly omnipotent" being could make a stone so heavy he could not lift it, this means the being was not truly omnipotent.

If the being could not make a stone that heavy, then he didn't carry out the given task due to lack of ability..... Which also means this being wasn't truly omnipotent.



It's a paradox for sure, but it also makes you question the concept of "true" omnipotence. erm


__________________

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 08:54 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Astner
The Ghost Who Walks

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
Well if a "truly omnipotent" being could make a stone so heavy he could not lift it, this means the being was not truly omnipotent.

If the being could not make a stone that heavy, then he didn't carry out the given task due to lack of ability..... Which also means this being wasn't truly omnipotent.



It's a paradox for sure, but it also makes you question the concept of "true" omnipotence. erm

Again, this is where Einstein's little quote "With logic you can go from A to B, but with imagination you can go everywhere." comes in.
With fantasy you can make, and even surpass omnipotence.

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:05 PM
Astner is currently offline Click here to Send Astner a Private Message Find more posts by Astner Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Astner
The Ghost Who Walks

Gender: Male
Location:

All we know is that other beings have been refered to as omnipotent.
And those have been refered to as supreme of all Marvel and DC, so if they arent omnipotent then no one in Marvel or DC is.

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:08 PM
Astner is currently offline Click here to Send Astner a Private Message Find more posts by Astner Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
With fantasy you can make, and even surpass omnipotence.
By definition, omnipotence is unsurpassible.


Omnipotence:

(literally, "all power"), is power with no limits or inexhaustible, in other words, unlimited power.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence



So if a being already has limitless power, then there would be no way to gain more power.

If this being was able to gain more power, then it was not truly omnipotent to begin with.


__________________

Last edited by Galan007 on Apr 4th, 2007 at 09:16 PM

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:13 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Astner
The Ghost Who Walks

Gender: Male
Location:

Imagination ...

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:16 PM
Astner is currently offline Click here to Send Astner a Private Message Find more posts by Astner Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
Imagination ...
I can't imagine a being with greater than omnipotent power, (if that's even possible).


__________________

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:35 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Astner
The Ghost Who Walks

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
I can't imagine a being with greater than omnipotent power, (if that's even possible).

Logicaly no, imaginationly (or whatever you call it) yes.

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:43 PM
Astner is currently offline Click here to Send Astner a Private Message Find more posts by Astner Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
Logicaly no, imaginationly (or whatever you call it) yes.
Infinity + 1?

Now that's pushing it...... Even by comic standards.


__________________

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:47 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Astner
The Ghost Who Walks

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
Infinity + 1?

Now that's pushing it...... Even by comic standards.

Pretty much, and no I don't think it's punching it, not too far at least.

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:55 PM
Astner is currently offline Click here to Send Astner a Private Message Find more posts by Astner Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
Pretty much, and no I don't think it's punching it, not too far at least.
In the comic world, I might be able to see some stupid shit like that being published, especially by Marvel.... (they seem to be more into the whole "greater levels of infinity" BS).

But using real logic, nothing can be greater than infinity, and nothing can have greater than omnipotent power.

But there can be more then one of each IMO.


__________________

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 09:59 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Evolve
KMC Herald

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Unknown

Groups of infinity, like this:

1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 ...

and larger sets, like say: 9,8,1,5,0 9,8,1,5,0 9,8,1,5,0 9,8,1,5,0 ...


but what infinite groupings of numbers have to do with 'power', and where marvel got the idea of doing this in the first place is beyond me...confused


__________________

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 10:11 PM
Evolve is currently offline Click here to Send Evolve a Private Message Find more posts by Evolve Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Ethereal
Groups of infinity, like this:

1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 1,2,4 ...

and larger sets, like say: 9,8,1,5,0 9,8,1,5,0 9,8,1,5,0 9,8,1,5,0 ...


but what infinite groupings of numbers have to do with 'power', and where marvel got the idea of doing this in the first place is beyond me...confused
I know, it was flawed from the beginning lol.

Because, no infinite set of numbers could be greater than another infinite set of numbers.

If one set were greater then the other.... Then the smaller of the two was never truly infinite to begin with.



Infinity = Infinity...

There is no infinity + 1. laughing out loud

IMO it was published to insult the intelligence of the readers.


__________________

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 10:15 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nataku8188
KMC Tyrant

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Sandbox.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Endless Mike
The Brothers weren't omnipotent, because they had trouble fighting each other, they weren't omniscient (or else they would already know the outcome of every fight before they set it up), etc.


Are you omnipotent? Omniscient? No?

Then how do you know?

You take Fighter A from Earth, strongest most unbeatable fighter to ever live, has beaten hundreds of people at the same time, just plain impossible to defeat.

He's essentially unbeatable because no one anyone knows about can defeat him. Unbeatable, just like Omnipotent, is a relative term that is based on context.

Now bring Fighter B from Mars, strongest and most unbeatable fighter to ever live, has beaten hundreds of people at the same time, just plain impossible to defeat.

He's essentially unbeatable because no one anyone knows about can defeat him. Unbeatable, just like omnipotent, is a relative term that is based on context.

Put Fighter A and Fighter B in a cage together, and either one is going to be better or they'll fight each other to a stalemate.


__________________


This forum sucks.

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 10:16 PM
Nataku8188 is currently offline Click here to Send Nataku8188 a Private Message Find more posts by Nataku8188 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Nataku8188
Are you omnipotent? Omniscient? No?

Then how do you know?

You take Fighter A from Earth, strongest most unbeatable fighter to ever live, has beaten hundreds of people at the same time, just plain impossible to defeat.

He's essentially unbeatable because no one anyone knows about can defeat him. Unbeatable, just like Omnipotent, is a relative term that is based on context.

Now bring Fighter B from Mars, strongest and most unbeatable fighter to ever live, has beaten hundreds of people at the same time, just plain impossible to defeat.

He's essentially unbeatable because no one anyone knows about can defeat him. Unbeatable, just like omnipotent, is a relative term that is based on context.

Put Fighter A and Fighter B in a cage together, and either one is going to be better or they'll fight each other to a stalemate.
I agree.


__________________

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 10:20 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nataku8188
KMC Tyrant

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Sandbox.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
I agree.


Of course you agree. I'm right. Omnipotent means limitless power. If something has yet to have shown a limit, than as far as perception is concerned, it's limitless. If I've lifted every set of weights you've ever asked me to lift without showing any strain, then as far as you know there is no limit to my strength. Is it actually limitless? No, but as far as you're perception is concerned it is. Just like the 'omnipotent' beings in comics, we have no way to truly know if they are omnipotent, we have just been told and lead to believe they are.


__________________


This forum sucks.

Old Post Apr 4th, 2007 10:26 PM
Nataku8188 is currently offline Click here to Send Nataku8188 a Private Message Find more posts by Nataku8188 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Endless Mike
Sqirrel Girl fanboy

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Undefeated isn't the same as omnipotent.

Omnipotent means you have no limits period, not just that you have shown none.


__________________


Sig by Starlock

Old Post Apr 5th, 2007 10:48 AM
Endless Mike is currently offline Click here to Send Endless Mike a Private Message Find more posts by Endless Mike Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
manorastroman
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
I know, it was flawed from the beginning lol.

Because, no infinite set of numbers could be greater than another infinite set of numbers.

If one set were greater then the other.... Then the smaller of the two was never truly infinite to begin with.



Infinity = Infinity...

There is no infinity + 1. laughing out loud

IMO it was published to insult the intelligence of the readers.


not sure if this has already been mentioned, but infinity doesn't necessarily equal infinity. there are strata of infinity. say you start out with one hundred dollars; your friend start's out with ninety. you are each given one dollar a day for infinite days. you will always have ten more dollars, even though you both have infinity monies. ja know?


__________________

Old Post Apr 5th, 2007 11:17 AM
manorastroman is currently offline Click here to Send manorastroman a Private Message Find more posts by manorastroman Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Juntai
Divine Vengeance

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
Well if a "truly omnipotent" being could make a stone so heavy he could not lift it, this means the being was not truly omnipotent.

If the being could not make a stone that heavy, then he didn't carry out the given task due to lack of ability..... Which also means this being wasn't truly omnipotent.



It's a paradox for sure, but it also makes you question the concept of "true" omnipotence. erm
Power should not be confused with strength in this regard. Without that misconception, this paradox doesn't exist.


__________________


I am God's mighty fist. I am God's strength made manifest.

Sig by: Skeets, S.S, thesilverspider, Sir SKEETS Alot

Last edited by Juntai on Apr 5th, 2007 at 12:49 PM

Old Post Apr 5th, 2007 12:37 PM
Juntai is currently offline Click here to Send Juntai a Private Message Find more posts by Juntai Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Juntai
Power should not be confused with strength in this regard. Without that misconception, this paradox doesn't exist.
Omnipotent is omnipotent.

If an omnipotent being wanted the strength to lift something, he should be able to will himself to have such strength.

So that paradox still holds true, even where strength is concerned.


__________________

Old Post Apr 5th, 2007 02:27 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 11:21 AM.
Pages (9): « First ... « 3 4 [5] 6 7 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book Movies » Comic Books » Pre-retcon Amalgam Brothers discussion

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.