That's not true. There has been small black holes and stars in DC, lol. You don't know what the writer meant, unless ya got proof that you want to post. Scans please.
Small stars naturally occurring in DC? Prove it.
Everyone knows what the writer meant idiot.
"You can't break those chains.""They are used to haul phucking stars between galaxies". The point was to prove the chains can't be broken.
Small altered unnatural stars would go against that silly Billy.
Honestly, why bother Carv? He's a guy that tries to bring real world logic into an area where it doesnt exist. Its futile to argue with somebody who lives in their own lonely world like that. He will only continue to twist things until they fit his narrative totally ignoring actual on panel feats and intent. Its so much easier to just ignore him and move on. He's not worth the aggravation.
When ray palmer shrinks and enters a normal human’s arteries, are those arteries withstanding a grown man’s weight in his heart? I don’t think so. Seems like the weight and size properties change but what the person is made up of do not. Same way as those microscopic red suns, weight and size were altered but other properties did not. We know this because they didn’t run out of energy and kept producing red sunlight. All you had to do was read your scan in it’s entirety not just look at the pictures of small red suns on a glove.
So you want to troll too by supporting Carver?
He's clearly trolling the thread by saying that the writer want the chains only to tow miniature stars (something batman can carry) as proof to why they can't be broken. Are you reading his posts? He's trolling the thread. And you are supporting it for bias reasons. Be objective for once. Coward.
You say things like that when my last post is hard to refute.
Clearly the writer was trying to make a point to why the chains are extremely durable. Towing miniature stars, something Batman (a human) can lugg around will contradict that point. You are clearly trolling now.
Have you read the entire exchange before commenting?
Summary, Carv is trying to say the chain feat for Superman doesn't count.
Although the writer states the chain can't be broken because they are used to haul stars between galaxies, Carv assumes these are miniature stars (where Batman can lug around and carry) as to prove the chains cannot be broken.
Yet he gets away with trolling like that only to comment on me. I'm not actually doing any trolling, Carv is.
I didn't realise he was known for this. I wouldn't have bothered engaging with him otherwise. He will literally ignore explicit evidence and attempt to gaslight you whilst providing zero evidence for an entire thread.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 27th, 2023 01:17 AM
