NO WAY Anakin would win did you even see the difference of light saber duels in episode 1 and 2. Sure he couldn't beat maul but thats because maul is the greatest sith duelist there ever was and annie couldn't even keep his arm. And just for the record Qui-Gon killed 103 dark jedi and is considered in episode 1 the book by terry brooks one of the greatest jedi of all times
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
First off, there is always a way. If there wasn't, Qui Gon would have been the Chosen One.
Second, Maulw as not the greatest Sith duelest ever. He's not even close.
Third, since when were there 103 dark Jedi in the times before the Naboo crisis?
Four, is Terry Brooks GL's stepson and equal partner in Lucasfilms? Otherwise, I don't think his word means that much. In any case, I bet you're either paraphrasing it wrong or using it out of context.
How the hell did you get that Maul was the greatest sith duelist ever? He wasn't even the greatest of his time. He was arrogant fast and filled with anger. He would fall against anybody that could hold out for a little while. Maul may have been powerful he was no master at anything.
I didn't even know that Dark Jedi were around before TPM, let alone stand 103.. If there were Dark Jedi around then how come Yoda acts all confused when he finds out about Maul? Why would 104 be more special?
Anakin also lost his arm against Dooku, who is a far greater fighter then both Qui and Maul.
greatest duelist of his time...i think most definately....but thats without force, just raw saber skills...but back to the topic....qui gon has no chance in hell of winning.
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: The Unknown Regions
Anakin wins, he's way too powerful for Qui-Gon to handle. If Qui-Gon couldn't beat Maul, I shudder to think of what Anakin would do to the poor old man.
Thats foolish even without force powers those guys would easily win..
And without the force completly? All of them would be like baby's, hardly able to handle their weapons let alone stand put up a good fight, seeing as Maul uses a weapon thats much harder to handle and his skills rely much more on the use of the force he will die quicker then the others.. well maybe not Yoda but definitly quicker then Mace and Dooku.
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
Maul couldn't take on a level headed opponent with any amount of skill in a saber fight. I imagine even Kit Fisto or Luminara Unduli could take him if he didn't get the drop on them.
there is no without the force, because you need the force to do half of the cool thins Jedi do with the force.
Maul is exceptional, but he's not on par with Dooku or later versions of Obi-Wan
back to the topic at hand, Qui-Gonn would go down and hard. Anakin would focus the fact that Qui-Gonn couldn't save his mother and use it to destroy the wise Jedi
__________________ "The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant, next to the power of the force."
Anakin would beat Qui-gon, but it wouldn't be as easy as everyone says I don't think. Qui-gon in TPM is quite under rated imo. Ya he loses to Maul, but I think the movie, the books, and everything else kind of states that Qui-gon is just about the best there is at the time other then Yoda.
Still though, Anakin (e3) beats qui-gon at any time.
I meant that Maul is the best sith duelist of his time and if you read the books he was in you would know that he killed that many. And theirs a difference between dark jedi and sith. Heres one he killed xantos. And Maul could not be beatan by kitty the smiling octopu$$y or luminaria
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
Yes, yes he could. Both of them were masters who were respected by the council and survivors of the battle of Geonosis and many other great battles. Separately, they have more battle experience than Maul, and Luminara for sure has a better command of the Force than Maul has demonstrated.
Apr 17th, 2005 10:40 PM
http://darthglentract.tripod.com/index.html Go Jawa's!!
