Still, a simple man doesn't compare by any means to a Jedi Master and one of the strongest padawans of the Order. How could you possibly make such comparrison or even try to create an arguement? :/
__________________ Thanks to ScarletSpeed for the sig!
A warrior knows nothing of surrender.
by AOTC kenobi was a knight and not a master. and darth bane by no means was simple. do some research on him then come back and tell me how "simple" he was.
Registered: May 2005
Location: .::The Anti-Fanboy Confederation::.
Oh well. But Bane also isn't Dooku.
Really. Dooku was one of the most powerful Jedi the Order produced in his entire history. Fact. He was also one of the most skilled duellist the Order had ever produced. Another fact. And then he received more than a decade of one of the - if not the - most powerful Sith Lord in history.
Bane compares how exactly? Essentially he's somebody who had some years of actual force and lightsaber training in comparison to the eight decades the Count studied in the same fields.
And yet Dooku, while being superior to Kenobi and Anakin without doubt, did benefit from the fact that Anakin decided to rush him and was taken out of the fight for several minutes (apparently). So Dooku just had to deal with Kenobi first. Yet the Count still needed to take a deep breath after he defeated Anakin. So I doubt that was a piece of cake for Dooku there.
Now if Anakin does the same against Bane I'm fairly sure that the Sith Lord will take both Jedi out. If they work together from the beginning of the fight on, it might get a little bit tricky for Bane. He might very well still defeat them both but I seriously doubt this would result in either "owning" or "raping" them.
__________________
"Dear God, what is it like in your funny little brains?"
Nov 12th, 2007 02:47 AM
http://darthglentract.tripod.com/index.html Go Jawa's!!
