Registered: May 2005
Location: .::The Anti-Fanboy Confederation::.
Account Restricted
Council, knock it off. We don't need a smartass in the argument, there are already plenty.
Anyways, Sorgo, in the case of Kit Fisto being decapitated and so on, not everything in the novel is to be put over the movie. My point in saying that was perhaps it mentions in passing that Cin Drallig used Makashi or something; if there's nothing to contradict the book, then it's true. Fisto's decapitation is contradicted by the movie itself, and therefore, not.
Considering Kit's death was a fine example of how the book contradicted the Movie, what makes you think what is said about Cin is liable information?
__________________
An Ancient Prophecy . . . The deity shall walk forth . . .
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
Erm... actually the novels can't be properly canon in the grand scheme of things since, in the case of the ROTS novel, it directly contradicts the movies- the highest source material. Therefore, it is suspect.
Registered: May 2005
Location: .::The Anti-Fanboy Confederation::.
Account Restricted
I'd be intrigued to hear of your Sources.
Then Lucas screwed up because Kit didn't get decapited on the Movie, his head wasn't placed on a table and judging by the look on his face I'm pretty damn sure he didn't die smiling.
__________________
An Ancient Prophecy . . . The deity shall walk forth . . .
Actually Lucas turned around and decided decap was 'too graphic'. The novel, where it doesn't cotnradict the movie is a perfectly valid source of information and right behind the movie and above almost anything else in the level of continuity
Jan 26th, 2006 12:01 AM
