Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Seminole Country, FL
Account Restricted
Agreed, an insignificant character like Wynn means nothing in terms of Canon, however Ragnos is stated as being the most powerful of the most powerful by more than 1 narrarator
__________________
Facts, the Anti Fanboy solution
Like IKC said the quotes we use are from the guy who invented them he could know. Uthar Wynn however is a stupid Sith guy who trains people nad has no real power to speak off, but who lives in a time of war and conquest and probably thinks that is a good thing.
Logically he would think that fighting a war, the thing that Sadow did was a good thing and thats why he called him the greatest. Kreia somebody with far more knowledge about the Dark Side and Sith history and who we can trust a lot more says nothing about Sadow really but calls Ragnos the best there is.
Uthat Wynn had clearly spent years at the academy on Korriban and would have learnt much about the sith (through holocrons and artifacts etc). And the opinion of the narrator means what exactly? Does George Lucas even know of the narrator? His opinion means nothing.
He wrote the comics, he put the opinion as a fact in the comic, his opinion is the entire comic. As far as the comic itself goes nobody his word could mean more. GL has agreed with the comic to be cannon therefor the opinion the narrator expreses as a fact in the comic is indeed a fact.
And Uthar Wynn may have spent years there, but he wasn't the head of the Academy for years. Also he says greatest not most powerful. And Sadow could rank as the greatest ,that wouldn't be a real strange to say. I'm sure many people would have agreed with him, Ragnos for all his power was still a coward according to many, and that would not make him the greatest.
Just read the comics, the Narrator states it in the comics as something that just is. Its not said by a character or a thing, he just states it. Like a writer would state in a book "That building is red" or "He was the greatest fighter ever seen" get it?
My god, he lived in a time when people were rebelling against him, ergo a time of war. And he was the greatest fighter was just an example I was given just like the building was red.
Look Fishy I have shown more intelligence then you have. How do you know people were rebelling agains him. Do you have any proof. And where in the actual story does it say Marka Ragnos was the greatest of the ancient sith or anything along those lines.
Strange, you seem to be the only one that thinks that.
And if you would look in any thread about Marka ragnos that you didn't create you would find more then enough evidence to prove that he is the greatest, I suggest you look it up.
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
No, you're an idiot. And it should be against the law to let you have a computer, since you abuse the priviledge.
The point is that GL has officially signed off on EU. It's a "parallel universe" in his own words, and so long as it doesn't contradict the movies themselves (Or assuming it doesn't pick and use names that he's preselected. He has a book of names) it stands. And KJA made his characters. He created the TOTJ series. When you see narration in the comics it is from the narrator, which is omniscient and the closest thing to KJA you can find aside from the synapsis. You arguing that Bioware's minor bit character Uthar Wynn is somehow going to know better than the guy who created Naga Sadow and the other ancient sith is beyond stupid. You keep saying "Well, he was there years..." Prove it. "Well, he'd know..." Substantiate his knowledge. Show us exactly where Uthar Whynn has shown to me more knowledgable about the affairs of the ancient sith compared to the PERSON WHO MADE THEM.
look you can talk about what the hell is canon and what the **** isn't but at the end of the day if that is all you can come up with there is no way you are right. There is no evidence for Ragnos' power so stop making assumptions you idiot.
We're making assumptions? This coming from the guy who thinks a crazy, opinionated Sith mentor's take on Sadow tops the opinion of Sadow's creator. Oh, damn. That's not just an assumption. That's idiocy.
No, we're making inferences based on a series of quotes from the narrator, and the narrator's opinion trounces everyone else's.
Mar 2nd, 2006 10:30 AM
