Gender: Male Location: The epitome of my evolution.
Account Restricted
I'll give you that, to an extent.
I think that the Joker character, and his mentality, is more intresting then Tony Stark. However, I don't think Ledger played his role any more convincingly than Downey as Stark.
[QUOTE=11396992]Originally posted by Quincy
[B]Marvel is making way more movies. But is that necessarily a good thing? I do like that Marvel is intermixing their universe. I hope that trend continues with Wolverine.
i think that iron man the incredible hulk and the punisher war zone( i don't how other people thought of it i liked it) were good movies and show that marvel is actually trying to get there movies in order instead of the mess its been for a couple of years
Yeah I think I saw it mentioned on marvel.com. I know the actor whos playing him I just cant remember his name. He played Papa Midnight in Constantine.
__________________ Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack.
- General George Patton Jr
I remember reading or maybe I saw it on ATOS or something, that the plan right now for a fourth "Blade" movie is a prequel based on Frost's character in Blade 1.
__________________
Play League of Legends for free and reference me - GentlemanZombie - when you join
I think the best course of action would be to reboot the series, however if they did do a 4th one, they could always throw morbius in, and maybe spiderman too.
Blade was the movie that kick started the resurrection of comic book movies, people forget that.
Plot accurate? No. Character accurate? Yes. That's what made it cool. It wasn't a Marvel movie really, but a movie with a Marvel character in.
It just happened to suffer from M.S.S. (Marvel Sequel Syndrome). First was good, second was accepted as better because it had more characters and more action, but wasn't. Third was utter ball-residue.
That's been the trend for literally all Marvel movies...except X-Men. Those were all shit except 2, which was actually the best one.