-Pr-
Hey Yo!
Gender: Male Location: Ireland.
Moderator
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Philosophía
My first impression is the Siegels are a bunch of money-thirsty assholes. Is there any context that might change that ?
nope.
__________________
Aug 15th, 2009 09:20 PM
Lek Kuen
Ti Lun
Gender: Unspecified Location: Zhu Shang Qiao
man this is soo messed up.
I really hope they can get out of this, and i still support dressing up as batman and hanging them over the side of a building untill they sign over the rights again
__________________
Props to Scythe for the sig
Aug 15th, 2009 10:02 PM
Squirrel Fart
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Canada
Supes should belong to Siegels and DC not WB.
__________________
Aug 16th, 2009 06:54 AM
Lek Kuen
Ti Lun
Gender: Unspecified Location: Zhu Shang Qiao
quote: (post ) Originally posted by The Nuul
Supes should belong to Siegels and DC not WB.
DC is a part of WB though, thats why they own it also.
__________________
Props to Scythe for the sig
Aug 16th, 2009 01:41 PM
-Pr-
Hey Yo!
Gender: Male Location: Ireland.
Moderator
quote: (post ) Originally posted by jalek moye
DC is a part of WB though, thats why they own it also.
aye. WB are also the reason we've had so few dc movies of the past few years. ba stards.
love the warhammer sig btw, you play dawn of war?
__________________
Aug 16th, 2009 03:57 PM
Lek Kuen
Ti Lun
Gender: Unspecified Location: Zhu Shang Qiao
yes i do. very good game
__________________
Props to Scythe for the sig
Aug 16th, 2009 04:00 PM
-Pr-
Hey Yo!
Gender: Male Location: Ireland.
Moderator
quote: (post ) Originally posted by jalek moye
yes i do. very good game
aye, totally agree. i still play dark crusade from time to time, and dow 2 of course is awesome.
__________________
Aug 16th, 2009 04:15 PM
Lek Kuen
Ti Lun
Gender: Unspecified Location: Zhu Shang Qiao
allthough I enjoyed the first one and its expansions more then the second one. The second one is still good
Warhammer 40k also has some cool comics
__________________
Props to Scythe for the sig
Aug 16th, 2009 04:54 PM
-Pr-
Hey Yo!
Gender: Male Location: Ireland.
Moderator
quote: (post ) Originally posted by jalek moye
allthough I enjoyed the first one and its expansions more then the second one. The second one is still good
Warhammer 40k also has some cool comics
i know what you mean. dow2 seems less like an all out battle fest compared to dow. dow2 is a lot more reliant on slow, tactical play.
yeah, the comics are pretty good. i read the ultramar one, and one series with the Black Templars. good stuff.
__________________
Aug 16th, 2009 05:39 PM
Squirrel Fart
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Canada
But WB doesn't know shit about Supes and cannot make a great Superman movie, they should leave the comics stuff to DC.
They are stuck doiing the same stupid plot and same stupid villain over and over again.
__________________
Last edited by Squirrel Fart on Aug 16th, 2009 at 06:19 PM
Aug 16th, 2009 06:17 PM
xJLxKing
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
Does anyone think Dc is going to change Superman's origins. I think they are changing it. A new comic is coming out called Superman: Secret Origins
__________________
Aug 16th, 2009 09:20 PM
Lek Kuen
Ti Lun
Gender: Unspecified Location: Zhu Shang Qiao
quote: (post ) Originally posted by xJLxKing
Does anyone think Dc is going to change Superman's origins. I think they are changing it. A new comic is coming out called Superman: Secret Origins
I heard they were just Fixing it, because not all of the byrne era stuff was removed yet.
Unless of course the sigels are making them change it or something like that
__________________
Props to Scythe for the sig
Aug 16th, 2009 11:34 PM
-Pr-
Hey Yo!
Gender: Male Location: Ireland.
Moderator
it's geoff johns' origin for superman. iirc, it's dc's way of nailing down a definitive origin.
__________________
Aug 16th, 2009 11:47 PM
emporerpants
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
so what does this all mean for superman? what does everyone think will happen to the character? will the comics be affected? if so, how? will superman be affected in all forms of media, such as not using him in cartoons or tv series?
__________________
Aug 17th, 2009 06:34 PM
Lek Kuen
Ti Lun
Gender: Unspecified Location: Zhu Shang Qiao
quote: (post ) Originally posted by emporerpants
so what does this all mean for superman? what does everyone think will happen to the character? will the comics be affected? if so, how? will superman be affected in all forms of media, such as not using him in cartoons or tv series?
if the Siegels dont want him to be used, DC wont be able to do anything about after 2013
__________________
Props to Scythe for the sig
Aug 17th, 2009 07:00 PM
xJLxKing
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
Obviously, they will allow him to be used. However, they will surely ask for a nice profit (like royalty). Superman means a lot to DC; they'll pay a good price for him.
In worst case scenario, I see Superman being used by other companies, even marvel. In addition, he'll probably be seen a lot less in comics after 2013. I don't see him having 5 different comics (AC, Superman, JLA..etc)
__________________
Aug 17th, 2009 07:15 PM
Lek Kuen
Ti Lun
Gender: Unspecified Location: Zhu Shang Qiao
quote: (post ) Originally posted by xJLxKing
Obviously, they will allow him to be used. However, they will surely ask for a nice profit (like royalty). Superman means a lot to DC; they'll pay a good price for him.
In worst case scenario, I see Superman being used by other companies, even marvel. In addition, he'll probably be seen a lot less in comics after 2013. I don't see him having 5 different comics (AC, Superman, JLA..etc)
or even worse they start there own comic company with him as there main hero
__________________
Props to Scythe for the sig
Aug 17th, 2009 07:16 PM
xJLxKing
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by jalek moye
or even worse they start there own comic company with him as there main hero
They wouldn't dare. They are just money hungry.
__________________
Aug 17th, 2009 07:39 PM
-Pr-
Hey Yo!
Gender: Male Location: Ireland.
Moderator
i really can't see dc letting this stand. superman makes them more money than most other heroes combined (bar bats). besides, they have like 3 years to put something together. if they keep it in court, even, they can keep the siegels at bay for years...
__________________
Aug 17th, 2009 09:49 PM
roughrider
Thunderer
Gender: Male Location: Canada
quote: (post ) Originally posted by The Nuul
But WB doesn't know shit about Supes and cannot make a great Superman movie, they should leave the comics stuff to DC.
They are stuck doiing the same stupid plot and same stupid villain over and over again.
Hey - Warners has owned DC for over 30 years. They produced the first movie with Christopher Reeve. This is just some serious nut-twisting business legalize.
What will the Siegels & Shusters do once they get all the rights in 2013?
(Maybe Alan Moore is their 'consigliere' in this. :evil )
__________________
"I'm not smart so much as I am not dumb." - Harlan Ellison
Aug 17th, 2009 10:09 PM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version