I am glad to see that there is someone on here talking some sense. GoldenEye rejuvenated the franchise after such a long lay-off and will always bee one of the bet films in the franchise.
are you forgetting that the Reason they gave Brosnan for not bringing him back as Bond was they said he was too old? that was complete B.S.They were just trying to keep from hurting his feelings that he was doing a bad job as Bond.Roger Moore was FAR older than Brosnan was when he decided to hang it up as Bond and go out on his own terms and Connery was a geezer when they brought him back as Bond in Never Say Never Again.Even with his toupee on you could see he looked far older than Brosnan did when Brosnan thanfully was told to leave as Bond.
Here is that link that proves this guy talks shit that fans were not outraged like he claims them to be when Craig took over.
some people only see what they want to see though so i doubt he ever read it.
why dont you ask HIM where HIS evidence is that Craig couldnt act to save his life and is a horrible actor and all that B.S crap he keeps sprouting off just cause he hates it that Craig replaced Brosnan?
the evidence is right here and black and white that most Bond fans contrary to what he keeps falsey rambling on that they were outraged about Brosnan leaving is pure B.S,
Like the link so accurately says,there WASN'T a huge outcry of opposition from most Bond fans when Brosnan left and craig took over. that is a non biased magazine that is reporting that.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Jul 23rd, 2010 at 05:25 PM
as you can see from how he replies to everybody,he attacks everybodys opinions.Telling me I dont know nothing at all about acting if I like Craig as an actor. He also shows he is clueless in everything he mentions including everything he says about Brosan, in the fact here he is saying that I like Wright as an actor when I NEVER said I liked Wright. I dont even know who Wright is as a a matter of fact. evidence this guy makes things up.
like alpha said so well,he is just posting to get a rise out of people.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Jul 23rd, 2010 at 05:47 PM
weak argument. Goldeneye had such an amazing script to it,of course it made Bond fans love that movie.Heck it made even Brosnan haters such as myself love the movie because of that. Im only going by what I have seen of everything that I have ever seen Brosnan do.I remember him in Remingten Steel because my parents used to watch the show so I saw a few episodes of it and he was just HORRIBLE in that show. When I saw him as Bond in all the Bond movies,nothing changed,same old Brosnan.horrible acting still.
For instance in Goldeneye since you mention that movie,I have seen that one quite a few times.would have seen it even more by now if even Craig or Dalton was in it.He says to that girl in bed-No more foreplay. That line SHOULD be funny but because of Brosnan's weak delivery,its NOT!!! Moore and Connery would have had me rolling in the chair.same as Craig and Dalton Im sure. His acting as Bond doesnt even come close to those guys.
Brosnan may have been good in other movies,but as Bond he was bad.
totally wrong.I have seen many films were a great script overcame a horrible actor,he had a good supporting cast around him and great special effects and a good story.as always,you ignore points brought up about how his line deliverys are horrible.again as I just proved,other people saw it on that thread that he cant stand to see Brosnan criticized.you can ignore it all you want,but the facts are right there and black and white on that thread that he just posts to get a rise out of people.Im not going to take the bait anymore.
again the FACTS are most Bond fans did not care when Brosnan left as that link clearly proves.you can choose to ignore it like he does.I dont care because its right there in black and white.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Jul 23rd, 2010 at 06:29 PM
oh and it doesnt look like I posted the right link of that non biased news source that proves most Bond fans did not care when Brosnan was FORCED out. I love how you DODGED those points also I gave earlier the B.S reason they gave Brosnan for not wanting him back of being too old for the part which again was B.S. in the fact Moore was older than he was and Connery looked a lot older than Brosnan when HE was brought back which is proof they were tired of Brosnan.
again here is the right link that talks about the truth that most Brosnan fans did not care when he was let go below.
for some reason,the one i provided before wont go to the article on Brosnan so here is the link to that thread where I posted before.its in my second to late post on that page.all there in black and white
FACT- you CANT cant get around,there wasnt a huge outcry of fan opposition to Craig replacing Brosnan as Bond.those were not my words those were from a non biased magazine.period,end of story.I know Im done.Like I said,its all there in black in white in that link.
Brosnan was fine as Bond, just after Goldeneye he was given pretty mediocre films to work with and probably one of the worse in the series, Die Another Day.
Thats exactly how I would put it below as far as the Bond actors go.
Darth Martin
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified
Location:
I wouldn't know if Brosnan is a good actor or not because I'm not too familiar with him outside of the four Bond films he's done. However, he is the worst 007 for me. It's not that he's horrible, it's just that the other 5 are better than him......and he's not all that close.
Pierce Brosnan was a far better Bond than Daniel Craig. As far as I am concerned Craig is too bland for the role and he doesn't have the skill to pull the character off.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 22nd, 2010 03:49 PM
I love how you DODGED those points also I gave earlier the B.S reason they gave Brosnan for not wanting him back of being too old for the part which again was B.S. in the fact Moore was older than he was and Connery looked a lot older than Brosnan when HE was brought back which is proof they were tired of Brosnan. 
