lol.. mortal thor struggled against shield agents.. if thor was all that then he should have gave those agents a beat down.. bane took it too and destroyed batman , second time for obvious reasons batman had to win..
Thor did give those agents a beat down, only the big guy at the end gave him any problems and even then Thor beat him without taking any injuries.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
I've seen Batman fans argue that both movie Batman and Bane would beat Captain America. in a 1-on-1 fight.
Their grasp on reality isn't always the best.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Yup, better choreography... which in movie terms end up being equivalent to better displayed skill.
Bane can "claim" he's trained and skilled and whatnot, but he just didn't show it that well. He came off as a somewhat slow moving brawler. Now you can blame that on poor choreography (I actually do) but as far as his character is concerned, that's his actual fighting style.
And Thor wiped out those SHIELD agents. All of them were armed,All of them are also on a higher level than the unarmed body guards Bane took on. I'm going to give it to the guy with centuries more experience.
And Bane never came off as skilled to me either. To be fair, neither did Bats that time around. The choreography for both their fights was made to have a weighty feel to it which is probably why they both came off as slow and unskilled.
Are you kidding me with banes twist punch? It looked cool but jesus this isn't Mortal Kombat. That was highly impractical. And Batman was pathetic in that movie (as he was in TDK, to be honest). He only ever seemed like a force to be reckoned with in Begins, when he was using smarts, skills and darkness to pull of a win (like Batman should). In the TDK and TDKR, the dude just went face first into every conflict, and it led to him getting his ass kicked by the villain every time. Its like his LoS training went right out the window after the first movie. The most impressive thing he did either movie was taking out those SWAT officers, but that was with his sonar device, Fox's help, and the officers being on the same side as Bats (giving an element of surprise).
Thor single highhandedly tore through a base-full of SHIELD agents with no gadgets or weapons, which puts him above Bats. Bats seemed to be evenly matched with Bane (with a slight skill and speed edge). The only reason Bane even won the first time was because of his potent painkillers, and he was taken out almost instantly when that was gone. Thor would take him apart in a brawl.
And both Batman's and (especially) Bane's skill pale in comparison to Thor's. Strength is not everything in a fight you know. And that's only IF Bane is actually stronger than Thor.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 26th, 2014 11:03 PM
