@Reality
What I don't understand is why you so desperately want Sentry to be some Multiversal perversion of his true self.
What makes Sentry interesting and awesome is his personality, his fight against himself. If he is between HH and mid Trans or high Trans in power because of his phobias it gives him more depth and makes it far more realistic and believeable than if he was some Molecul Man 2.0.
Thor is a HH who dips into the trans range from time to time and only on the most rarest occasions higher. Same is true for Hulk or Superman. If they woul always be in this tier it would be boring and unrealistic if they struggle, even if you try to excuse it with holding back and going all out. For Sentry this works with phobias but on an Universal or Skyfather scale this would be just stupid and would contradict everything we saw in comics.
So be happy that he is "just" HH to trans, seriously.
__________________
Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot
Gender: Unspecified Location: In Hell, torturing your soul.
Account Restricted
If your post is addressed to me, you must understand that I don't want anything coming from a fictional character.
I investigate to understand how the character works, what the writer intents are and once I have understand everything I can, I stick with the information that I have.
If new informations comes (relatable because coming from official sources), I change my point of view accordingly to the new informations.
I know that many people hate what I say about Sentry but everything is the closest possible to Marvel's intent.
I can agree on that.
Prof, Sentry is a fictional character in a fictional world. His abilities are what the writers intend him to have, if he is a Molecule Man 2.0 I am fine with that if the stories continues to entertain me.
That's one way to see it.
Not really.
Everything make sense once you got all the informations to have the full scope of the character and that's what makes this twisted God interesting.
Writers don't really classify the characters the way people do on battle forums if they do that at all.
I'm glad that Sentry can change his gender whenever he wants it.
Are those showings supposed to be superior to what superman has done?
Lol at wwhh Sentry being his weakest.. He specifically said the opposite. He was cutting loose.
Superman beats Galactus level Skyfather on panel. Like Darkseid.
You haven't really provided anything, which debunks my statements. And youu haven't brought anything new to the table, which makes me think that Superman stands a chance. In the end of the day Supermans offensive options are punching hard and shooting laser beams out of his eyes. And none of those options are enough to stop the Sentry.
"But Enzeru, you haven't mentioned how Superman didn't have as much solar energy in his cells at that time! And you also haven't mentioned, that he got a beat down by two Kryptonians before tanking the nuke! So a weakened Superman still survived a nuclear explosion."
That's not the point I was trying to make. My point is, that some debaters here are too easy to point out how great Superman is in these instances... While giving the Sentry the same benefit. Some posters here are too quick to make fun of the Sentry getting some sense punched into him by the Helicarrier explosion, while completely ignoring the fact, that he got attacked and weakened by a legion of empowered heroes.
Anyway, the Sentry has dished out planet busting energy, while still holding back.
And there is not even additional context to that. Supermans heat energy destroyed a quarter mile radius, when he gave it his very all. Sentry destroyed planets, while holding back.
To think that Supermans heat vision is going to bother the Sentry... I don't know what to tell you.
And anything regarding punching and vibrating... I mean, a depowered Sentry was willingly tanking punches from World War Hulk and asking for more.
I have my doubts, that Superman can inflict more damage than World War Hulk with mere punches alone.
You start off by naming Sentrys lowest jobber showings, which go up against everything serious he has accomplished and performed in the comics...
... while for Superman you look for the absolutely highest showing you can come up with.
"I am pretty sure that in a fight between Spider-Man and Wolverine... Spider-Man would win, because he beat Firelord, a herald of Galactus, while Wolverine got knocked out by a deer."
Then you forge a strategy, where Superman gets free shots on the non-interactive punching bag that is the Sentry.
And you completely ignore f.E. Sentrys empathy abilities, which allow him to dismantle and paralyse opponents immediately - something, that would prevent Superman from starting his own offense.
And then you tell me to pretty much **** myself.
Yeah, I think I'm done. It's kinda obvious, who you want to win and that you don't care about much else.
Yes it is. Bendis confirmed that Reynolds only died because he wanted to stay dead.
He completely revamped Molecule Man and turned him into a Universal anchor. But that doesn't matter, because 616 Owen Reece was still a suppository and control mechanism for Infinte Power so Hickman didn't downgrade him or whatever nonsense you're arguing.
Your transparent low balling nonsense is neutralized by Sentry s pathetic performance. In combat. keep whining. Relative combat showings trump area of effect or collateral damage comparisons.
Superman IS far faster and more skilled, yes. He can conceivably attack and avoid Sentry at will, not that Sentry can overcome his invulnerability or stamina. Problem?
Wait.. You're arguing that Sentry can defeat Superman in a contest of Willpower? Countered by Torquasm Vo. Brainiac. Despero. Nope.
I think the more formidable opponent has the advantage. Feel free to complain about your weak reasoning.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 4th, 2017 06:27 PM
are you joking?
