Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Ugghhh **** I just realized I used the Q
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Weird how you say I'm not entitled to an opinion about the actions of another person, when you clearly think you're entitled to an opinion about other people's thoughts... very strange indeed.
As someone with values who isn't a moral relativist, I can make value judgments about certain actions and behaviors.
I think casual sex is immoral for example. I've thought a lot about it, and I think it's immoral. I would be outraged however at any attempt by the government to enforce that with force of law because I would count it a violation of someone else's rights. I also would not be a dick to or look down on someone for having casual sex. My best friend has engaged in casual sex before, as have some of my other friends, but I don't berate them or think of them as lesser people or think that I'm on a ****ing pedestal or something. I know I'm not perfect. I think being lazy is immoral too, and I'm fully willing to admit I can be a lazy **** sometimes when I have responsibilities I need to take care of. I also know I can be too selfish sometimes when I should be more generous. I also believe holding resentment towards other people is immoral, and that's something I certainly slip up on.
I don't count someone's worth based on their sins so to speak, I view people with an inalienable worth and believe in loving everyone regardless of their actions (though again I slip up there, and again that's an example of a moral failing of mine).
I don't think of myself as perfect or spend time trying to contemplate superiority to other people, that doesn't mean that in my quest to be a better person I'm not entitled to trying to understand what is moral and what is not moral.
So I ask you Adam, what makes [royal] you think you have a right to opine about how another person lives their life having opinions on whatever they please thinking that they care about how you think about whatever lifestyle they practice by holding the moral views they hold?
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
You've clearly gotten confused. I outlined it quite clearly and even cited the ethics rules. There's no this or that - I've outlined it extremely clearly.
You're hopeless. I don't know if you're really this stupid or if you're playing dumb to troll because you don't want it to be obvious that you're wrong so you pretend to be the contrarian to make your point seem as though it is any semblance of legitimacy?
Honestly, I do not think anybody takes your point seriously by this point.
Honestly, Robtard is right. He's clearly homophobic and using his religion as his shield.
Sorry, this is not part of Christ's teachings.
If Jesus Christ owned that bakery, he'd make the gay men TWO cakes (a wedding cake and an amazing grooms cake), make them fabulous as hell, and give it to them for free. And then hug them both, tell them that he loves them, and will give them a small sermon about doing righteousness in all things.
I'd say your premises are wrong to begin with and here's why: everyone is sinless and all are "dirty" before God. And we are to forgive all their trespasses and NOT judge.
So even your premise is flawed enough to not make it a theologically sound vis-a-vis Christianity.
This is not a "No True Scotsman Fallacy." Christ was quite clear on this points. No amount of mental gymnastics will get a Christian out of the trouble of contradicting the "all are sinful, forgive all, do not judge one another" teachings.
If at any point a person declares themselves a follower of Christ's teachings and in the next breath, proclaims their superiority over homosexuals, they have fundamentally failed to follow Christ's teachings.
You clearly used a time-machine, went into the future, read my posts on KMC to get an idea of something clever to say, and then went back to your original timeline, and posted a paraphrase of my idea.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Jesus also wouldn't be running around calling people Nazis', racists, homophobes etc.... he'd be reaching out and trying to change their hearts.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Bingo. Jesus would conjure up dictionaries and encyclopedias so they can learn all about what words mean and what actual nazis and fascists did.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 29th, 2018 05:01 PM
