quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
It's not about what I want. I gave the conclusion to both scenarios. If OP would have created the thread with either scenario then my conclusions would be the same.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Silent Master
Explain how neutral ground means ground where only one side is powered up.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
Setting 1:
Has effect of being on Asgard and Earth at the same time.
Conclusion 1: Zod can't win

Setting 2:
Has the effect of being on Earth but outside of Asgard.
Conclusion 2: Zod wins

Setting 3:
Has neither effect of being on Asgard and on a Earth.
Hela wins (Zod would be powerless).

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Translation:

Setting 1:
If Hela are allowed her “feats”, then Zod can’t win.

Setting 2:
Since I (h1) won’t accept any of Hela’s “feats”, then a “featless” Hela can’t win.

Setting 3:
If the conditions I want for Hela are applied to Zod FAIRLY, then Zod gets stomped like an ant.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
You can troll all you want, it doesn't change the conclusions to those settings.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Silent Master
Explain in detail how what he posted was trolling.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
It does not attempt to debate who wins in this thread.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
You can troll all you want, it doesn't change the conclusions to those settings.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
It does not attempt to debate who wins in this thread.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
So you’re not even gonna deny your tactics?







WTF are you talking about. It is LITERALLY a statement on who you think wins the debate based on your arguments. Get back on your meds dammit.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
Prove it. What conclusion do you disagree with?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Reading comprehension? Where in my post did I agree/disagree? I merely clarified your tactics so it could be plain for everyone to see.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
How can I be implementing tactics when I give a conclusion to each scenario. Everyone does this. You do not address others.

If the fight is A then character X wins
But if the fight is B then character Y wins.


Where is the tactic?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Translation:

Setting 1:
If Hela are allowed her “feats”, then Zod can’t win.

Setting 2:
Since I (h1) won’t accept any of Hela’s “feats”, then a “featless” Hela can’t win.

Setting 3:
If the conditions I want for Hela are applied to Zod FAIRLY, then Zod gets stomped like an ant.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
What a dumb question to ask. Your conclusions were come upon using the tactics you used duh.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
So do you believe that Hela, outside of Asgard, could beat a Zod that has his powers as he would on earth?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Soooo, reading comprehension or are you just trying to unsuccesfully bait?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nevan
Thor believed that even if they left Asgard, Hela would still hunt them down and beat them, so either:

1) Any power Hela receives from Asgard is permanent.

2) Even without the power up, Hela is still more powerful than the Revengers combined.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by h1a8
You believe that Hela is equally as powerful on Asgard as she is when she is off. That's what this boils down to.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Post where I wrote the above or you owe me an apology, little liarman.