__________________ Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Schiff is saying Trump colluded and the proof is in plain sight.
So...why did we need to waste millions of dollars on an investigation if the proof was in plain sight?
EDIT: Ever notice whenever democrats mention the trump tower meeting they never mention the fact the russian woman Trump Jr. met has connections to Fusion GPS?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
He should be forced to show his evidence from his statements in the past stating that he had seen evidence and fed the media monster or leave his position.
It isn't about feelings when the man made a statement that is contrary to the Mueller findings (months before Mueller even finished his investigation.)
Also democrats can't whine since I'd be shocked if none of them has ever called for Trump to resign.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
"My colleagues might think it's okay that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what's described as the Russian government's effort to help the Trump campaign. You might think that's okay.
My colleagues might think it's okay that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the president's son did not call the FBI; he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help—no, instead that son said that he would 'love' the help of the Russians.
You might think it's okay that he took that meeting. You might think it's okay that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it's okay that the president's son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it's okay that they concealed it from the public. You might think it's okay that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn't better. You might think that's okay.
You might think it's okay that when it was discovered, a year later, that they then lied about that meeting and said that it was about adoptions. You might think that it's okay that it was reported that the president helped dictate that lie. You might think that's okay. I don't.
You might think it's okay that the campaign chairman of a presidential campaign would offer information about that campaign to a Russian oligarch in exchange for money or debt forgiveness. You might think that's okay, I don't.
You might think it's okay that that campaign chairman offered polling data to someone linked to Russian intelligence. I don't think that's okay.
You might think it's okay that the president himself called on Russia to hack his opponent’s emails. You might think it's okay that later that day, in fact, the Russians attempted to hack a server affiliated with that campaign. I don't think that's okay.
You might think it's okay that the president's son-in-law sought to establish a secret back channel of communication with the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility. I don't think that's okay.
You might think it's okay that an associate of the president made direct contact with the GRU through Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, which is considered a hostile intelligence agency. You might think it's okay that a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say in terms of dirt on his opponent.
You might think it's okay that the national security adviser designate secretly conferred with the Russian ambassador about undermining U.S. sanctions, and you might think it's okay that he lied about it to the FBI.
You might say that's all okay, that's just what you need to do to win. But I don't think it's okay. I don't think it's okay. I think it's immoral, I think it's unethical, I think it's unpatriotic and, yes, I think it's corrupt—and evidence of collusion.
Now, I have always said that the question of whether this amounts to proof of conspiracy was another matter. Whether the special counsel could prove beyond a reasonable doubt the proof of that crime would be up to the special counsel, and I would accept his decision, and I do. He's a good and honorable man, and he is a good prosecutor.
But I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is okay. And the day we do think that's okay is the day we will look back and say that is the day that America lost its way.
And I will tell you one more thing that is apropos of the hearing today: I don't think it's okay that during a presidential campaign Mr. Trump sought the Kremlin's help to consummate a real estate deal in Moscow that would make him a fortune—according to the special counsel, hundreds of millions of dollars. I don't think it's okay to conceal it from the public. I don't think it's okay that he advocated a new and more favorable policy towards the Russians even as he was seeking the Russians' help, the Kremlin's help to make money. I don't think it's okay that his attorney lied to our committee. There is a different word for that than collusion, and it's called 'compromise.'
Cool, I just hope that information Schiff had previously that said absolutely proved collusion with Russia was shared with Mueller:
Schiff did a great job whitewashing answers that were already covered by Mueller. Once again Schiff should release his foolproof information that showed collusion.
Brain-numbing sound bites, no one said anything was ok in regards to Russia messing with our elections, those are Schiffs words..........I suppose Schiff also believes that someone controlls Russia operatives in the Republican party to believe they controlled the Russians offering data (that they sold to Hillary already.)
Going through that bit by bit is just trashing sound bites. Show your report Schiff that proves collusion....
The difference is that Schiff is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and has seen the evidence, whereas you have not even seen the report.
Will say Schitt better have some solid reasoning if not plausible proof, if this is just a shit tactic, it's lame and he should just shut up.
Having said that, calling for Schitt to resign because he's seemingly doing his job is typical Trumper intimidation tactics and FFS, release the full report to Congress at least, if the public is deemed not worthy/too stupid to see it my Trump Co.
Yeah, clearly there seems to be a problem with communication. I never claimed to have seen the evidence but Mueller has. Schiff said many months ago (was it prior to Mueller I don't recall) he went to the media and stated he had evidence, so my response: show it. Whoops apparently only Schiff was able to see the information and make claims, it's all locked away from Mueller
I don't think he should resign as a senator but if he ship showed garbage talking points like his excuses above he shouldn't lead the committee at the very least.
Well hold on, if Schitt lied about seeing evidence the president committed treason...why should he not resign? That is a pretty spectacular lie to tell.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
IIRC the federal law surrounding such matters is that personal information unrelated to the evidence or lackof for criminal matters be redacted, because it is beyond the purview of the Justice Department to damage someone's reputation or violate their personal privacy in matters irrelevant.
So for example, if they discovered Trump was ****ing another pornstar but not doing anything illegal, that would be redacted, because it is not criminally relevant information.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
If we're going to do a "he lied, so he should resign", then you should be shouting for Trump to resign first and foremost as he's accused and lied about things big and small since swearing into office.
The POTUS sets the example; or he did before this Admin.
It's not the fact he lied, all politicians lie. It's what he lied about. Treason technically could result in the death penalty.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.