I dont get how you can say that you were mean to me because im a science denier and now youre down playing the importance of science.
Why is this? Convenience or something?
No I didn't. Not at all. It's not even a stretch on your part: you're plain wrong.
Try to be more honest, in the future.
I was referring to only my specific innovations. Only 2 published white papers. It was also a joke. Because no-one gives a shit about the data handling logarithms and virtual hardware architecture when I wrote about memristors.
Ohhhhhh i thought you were claiming you werent insulting me because you view me as a science denier, NOT that you were refuting my claim that you were downplaying the importance of science.
So you do think science is very important and were not saying it isnt important, and now i get what part you were referring to as a joke.
Im caught up now and no longer misconstruing what youre talking about there. My bad on the misunderstanding.
In reference to atheism as an umbrella term: As i said from the beginning i already understood that argument and have had it with others (the distinction between theism and atheism, and gnosticism and agnsoticism. In dawkins the god delusion he has a 7 part sliding spectrum that discusses that, which is the source material i constructed my argument from.
I was arguing most people dont understand that and was making the assertion that that could affect polling massively.
However, i was unaware that definitions are provided at the time of polling.
Again, i barely graduated highschool and was misinformed in terms of my predicate, which is why my argument was off.
So yes, i actually do have a better idea of polling and that is because our exchange. Thank you for that, now i wont make that same argument in real life.
My beliefs are beliefs, im just saying some beliefs are more justified than others based on evidence. I always try to find the beliefs with the most evidence.
Just like most people except the very pious, ideologues and their followers, and morons.
If youre looking for reasons to not talk to me, you dont have to.
Im all for free association, i just don't understand the eagerness to categorize me as a bad actor.
Don't act like you weren't loving it the entire time, you little whore.
__________________
"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
*cries while rocking back and forth in cold shower and holding a trophy that says "best actor" from a third grade production on wizard of oz i was in, that i made up just now.*
That would be an example of cancel culture. So in your idealized scenario, cancel culture is an essential corrective mechanism in a free market. So if you support one, you necessarily have to support the other.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 19th, 2020 11:09 PM
