The Last of the Mohicans Review
by Roger Snappy Rubio (rsnappy%polaris DOT unm DOT edu AT lynx DOT unm DOT edu)September 29th, 1992
THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS
A film review by Roger Snappy Rubio
Copyright 1992 Roger Snappy Rubio
Starring Daniel Day Lewis and Madeline Stowe
Directed by Michael Mann
I have it on good word that this is one of the most historically accurate pictures made today (as far as the costumes, mannerisms, etc. are concerned). As the director, Michael Mann, was a stickler for detail, it does not surprise me. And although this may be an essentially fictional story, it nevertheless is told with gritty realism and passionate imagery.
THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS is a remake/film version of the Cooper classic of the same name. The first film was made in 1936 and the 1992 version is based both on the book and the 1936 screenplay. I have never read the book, and, being a movie marauder, the movies kept me from reading my history books back in high school, so when it comes to historical accuracy or content, my reputation is a little lackluster. But I went with a former history major to see this film, and she told me that this movie was one of the best, historically speaking. So I will not attempt to analyze it from that perspective, just strictly from a filmmaker's perspective (something I know a little more about).
Daniel Day Lewis was great. Madeline Stowe, I am sorry to say, could have been replaced by any good actress with the same physical build, but don't get me wrong...she was good also. (I guess I'm too used to seeing Daniel Day Lewis charging up a hill in the advertisements.) But all the actors played their parts well, and the foreign accents (which weren't foreign at the time) were executed with a professional demeanor. The war scenes especially took my breath away. There is one scene where one army gets ambushed by another (I won't say who gets ambushed) and the film doesn't change scenes for a stint. It is just long enough for you to realize that there is nothing the ambushed army can do, or for that matter, is capable of doing. Scenes and situations like that in this movie are very well done.
I can't say much for story, realistically. It's a good story, but I found it to be a little dry. The movie also tries to both excite you and take your breath away, but it falls somewhere in the middle, and cannot be called either a spectacle or a gripping drama. Whether that's good or bad, I'm not sure; I guess you'll have to judge for yourself. I guess the action (or war) scenes were filmed with the intent of making the audience sympathetic to the cause or plight of the particular situation. I think it went a little too fast for that. A good example of appeal-for-audience-sympathy would be GLORY, which was a very well done civil-war epic. And a good example of spectacle would have to be LAWRENCE OF ARABIA, where your jaw drops to the floor in every scene. THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS tries to combine elements of both extremes, and while it is effective, I wouldn't say it was really remarkable.
But don't take my ramblings for it; see it for yourself. It is a good movie. I don't believe it will win any major Oscars, but I have been wrong about that before. Check it out...that's what it's there for!
THE SNAPMAN
[email protected]
(Roger Rubio)
More on 'The Last of the Mohicans'...
Originally posted in the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup. Copyright belongs to original author unless otherwise stated. We take no responsibilities nor do we endorse the contents of this review.
