Shall We Dance? Review

by Susan Granger (ssg722 AT aol DOT com)
October 20th, 2004

Susan Granger's review of "Shall We Dance?" (Miramax Films)
    "Shall We Dance?" is not exactly a Halloween movie but it's certainly frightening to watch Jennifer Lopez, Richard Gere and Susan Sarandon sidestep through ill-advised remake of an elegant, utterly delightful 1996 Japanese film with the same title that glorified ballroom dancing.
    Set in Chicago, the romantic comedy revolves around John Clark (Gere), a mild-mannered, middle-aged estate lawyer who takes an elevated train to work. Coming home one day, out of the train window, he spots sad-eyed Paulina (Lopez), an exotic, alluring instructor at Miss Mitzi's Dancing School. Intrigued, he eventually gets off at Miss Mitzi's stop and enrolls for lessons. Meanwhile, back in suburbia, his concerned, loving wife (Susan Sarandon) hires a detective (Richard Jenkins) to discover why John isn't coming home after work on Wednesday nights.
    Written by Audrey Wells and directed by Peter Chelsom, it's riddled with clichés, both verbal and cinematic. Like when J. Lo defines dancing as "a vertical expression of a horizontal wish."
    While the main characters flounder, the supporting actors flourish - like a blowzy, brassy waitress (Lisa Ann Walter) who grabs John as a dance-contest partner, an obnoxious co-worker (Stanley Tucci) with a secret passion for sequins, a secretly gay instructor (Bobby Cannavale) and a shy African-American (Omar Benson Miller) who loses weight and finds a fiancee. Yet, amidst the idiocy, there's one brief but wonderful scene where John finally masters the sublimated desire of the torrid tango, reminding you of Gere's tap-dancing finesse in "Chicago." Obviously, Gere now loves to dance. On the Granger Movie Gauge of 1 to 10, "Shall We Dance?" is a clunky, lead-footed 4. Sit this one out and chalk it up to a misstep for everyone.

More on 'Shall We Dance?'...

Originally posted in the newsgroup. Copyright belongs to original author unless otherwise stated. We take no responsibilities nor do we endorse the contents of this review.