Titanic Review

by Kevin Patterson (kevinp AT princeton DOT edu)
January 7th, 1998

Film review by Kevin Patterson

Titanic **** (out of four)
PG-13, 1997
Directed and written by James Cameron.
Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Kate Winslet, Billy Zane, Bill Paxton.

I must admit that I was more than a little skeptical when I first heard about "Titanic" and its numerous production delays and its $200 million budget. I wasn't sure how well the Hollywood Happy Ending Factory would handle a tragedy like the sinking of the Titanic. The laborious effort that reportedly went into the film made me think, more than anything, that this was another case of a studio wasting an enormous amount of time and money trying to make a mediocre movie into an epic. In other words, I expected a way-overdone and probably irritating disaster movie.

Fortunately, I turned out to be wrong on all counts. For one thing, writer-director James Cameron doesn't flinch from the unpleasant facts of the story, namely that hundreds were killed in the boat's sinking. More importantly, he doesn't make the mistake of having all the sympathetic characters survive so as to dull the audience's emotional reactions. Titanic is a disaster movie, but it has none of the triteness and cheap thrills normally associated with that genre because we actually care about the characters as people rather than as one-dimensional elements of suspense.
Cameron spends most of his time focusing on the story of Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio), a young, rootless American who wins his ticket on the Titanic's maiden voyage in a card game, and Rose (Kate Winslet), a wealthy young woman who is betrothed to the cold-hearted, domineering Cal (Billy Zane). This is clearly a marriage of financial and social convenience for the two families. Rose dreads the life that awaits her so much that she is about to throw herself overboard and die when Jack stumbles upon her and talks her out of it, and of course we all know what happens next. Yes, the ensuing love story between the two and the resulting disapproval of Rose's family is predictable, and yes, it's a bit melodramatic at times, but it still works pretty well and adds the necessary human element to the story.

The love story and character development occupy roughly the first half of the film; then comes the infamous collision with the iceberg and the resulting slow destruction of the ship. Uniting the two halves is a pointed social commentary about the mentality that led to the Titanic disaster. The decks of the ship were divided by social class, for example, with the result being that the crew evacuated the wealthier passengers first. Due to some cold-hearted publicity snobs' desire to avoid "cluttering up the deck," there were not enough life boats, and as a result more than half the passengers, all of them of "lower" social status, were left to drown.

Throughout the film, all of the aristocratic types casually refer to the Titanic as "unsinkable," as if it were somehow a fact that did not even deserve to be questioned. Some of the crew seem to share this confidence, and this seems to be at least part of the reason that the iceberg was not spotted earlier: no one was watching very closely. Cameron never addresses the issue of why the ship was thought to be unsinkable, but I think (or at least I hope) that this is intentional: the real tragedy, as the film rightly points out, is not so much that a supposedly unsinkable ship ended up sinking, or that the collision might have been avoided, but that anyone could be so stupid and arrogant to presume to have constructed an "unsinkable ship" in the first place.
The film runs over three hours long, but it is never tedious or boring, and as a result I could go on for quite a while about all the different things it does right. I will, however, limit myself to mentioning a few other elements which I liked. One is that Cameron creates some truly loathsome characters among the aristocrats, but he resists the temptation to send them to the sort of gruesome demise that has become commonplace for movie villains nowadays; he is content simply to expose them as narrow-minded and selfish. Another is the sometimes disturbingly funny gallows humor that pops up occasionally without undermining the fundamentally serious quality of the film ("Great drowning music!" exclaims a passenger to the ship's band, who, true to popular legend, do in fact continue playing to the bitter end.) Finally, he frames the story in a flashback as Rose, now 101 years old, recounts the story of the Titanic to an underwater explorer (Bill Paxton). Since the story and time period are, I imagine, completely alien to almost any viewer, the presence of the modern-day characters helps to ease the audience into the story, but manages not to take up unnecessary time or distract from the film's focus.

I don't know if "Titanic" is exactly flawless, but it does so many things so well that any minor missteps (such as the dumb Celine Dion song that played over the final credits) are excusable. It is certainly the most successful "epic" film that I have seen recently, and it seems fairly likely from the recent buzz that Cameron, DiCaprio, and Winslet may be receiving some well-deserved Oscar nominations pretty soon. The increasingly "bottom line"-oriented movie industry does not let $200-million epic masterpieces happen often, so don't miss "Titanic."

- - - - - -
Visit my Film Reviews home page:
http://members.aol.com/KTPattersn/reviews.html

More on 'Titanic'...


Originally posted in the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup. Copyright belongs to original author unless otherwise stated. We take no responsibilities nor do we endorse the contents of this review.