You've Got Mail Review
by Dustin Putman (FilmFan16 AT aol DOT com)December 23rd, 1998
You've Got Mail * * (out of * * * * )
Directed by Nora Ephron.
Cast: Meg Ryan, Tom Hanks, Greg Kinnear, Parker Posey, Jean Stapleton,
Dabney Coleman, Steve Zahn, Dave Chappelle.
1998 - 118 minutes.
Rated PG (for mild profanity).
Reviewed December 20, 1998.
"You've Got Mail," the third showcase that has brought together the
winning team of Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan (after 1990's odd-ball "Joe Vs.
the Volcano" and 1993's charming "Sleepless in Seattle"), obviously
seemed like a no-brainer for director Nora Ephron and co-writer Delia
Ephron since what they have basically made this time around is a ho-hum,
mostly sloppy retread of many far more intelligent and witty romantic
comedies.
Set in New York City, Kathleen Kelly (Meg Ryan), for many years, has run
her late mother's quaint children's bookstore called "The Shop Around
the Corner" (which was the title of the original James Stewart picture,
for which this film is based on). She has a writer boyfriend (Greg
Kinnear), but has been recently sending honest and intimate e-mails over
AOL to a man that she first met in an Over 30 chatroom, but they have
decided to keep their identities anonymous. What Kathleen doesn't know
is that her secret e-mail buddy is actually Joe Fox (Tom Hanks), who has
his own hyper and giddy girlfriend (Parker Posey), and is about to open
a more high-profile book store on the same street, threatening
Kathleen's business. The gimmick for the film is that these two people
have grown to love each other over the internet, even though they are
feuding in real life.
"You've Got Mail," is a sleek, well-photographed romantic comedy that
actually compliments the beauty of NYC more than the actual stars of the
film, since this story has been done far too many times before, and much
better, at that. One of the biggest problems with the film is that there
didn't appear to be any attempt to make an original film. No doubt,
Ephron assumed that she had it made once she cast Hanks and Ryan, and so
she forgot to add a quality screenplay. Watching the film, I didn't get
any sense of excitement, urgency, or suspense involving the question of
if Hanks and Ryan would get together at the end, since I knew for a fact
that they would. Far too many times, I predicted dialogue and even what
would occur in the next scene, and most of the time I was right on the
mark. If an audience member can predict what the characters are going to
say before they actually say it, then you know you're in trouble.
I will not criticize Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan, since both of them have
proved to be talented actors, and Ryan is simply too cute for words, but
that is the exact problem. They are too good to be wasting their time in
such a tried-and-true Hollywood formula. "Sleepless in Seattle" was also
predictable, but that film was more sound and sharp in its writing and I
cared about the characters more. Why not shake things up a bit and add a
little creativity to the mix, instead of making what is basically an
inferior remake to "...Seattle?"
Rarely have I seen so many charasmatic supporting characters wasted so
blatantly as they are in this movie. Greg Kinnear has the most chance of
a developed character, but he disappears towards the middle and there is
no mention of him again. Parker Posey, in her first notable role in a
big-budget film, is punished with the emotionless "bitch" role, and is
not even given one scene where she and Hanks simply talk. It's a shame
Ephron decided to cast such a wonderful, fresh actress, only to throw
her to the curb. Meanwhile, Dave Chappelle and Steve Zahn make no
impression whatsoever with roles that might as well have been classified
as extras.
Maybe I am making it sound like I hated "You've Got Mail," which isn't
the case. The film was never boring, but also never what I would
consider entertaining. Basically, it just seemed to sit there, and it
amazed me how little could be accomplished, even though the running time
is overstretched to two hours. Hanks and Ryan, like always, have a great
deal of chemistry together, and I liked their characters. I liked a few
of the lines of dialogue (when Hanks enters a store, he introduces the
two children he is with as his aunt and brother). The soundtrack of
popular pop songs from the 70's, 80's, and 90's were fun to listen to.
Everything seemed in place for a charming, and I was hoping,
imaginative, romantic comedy, but to no avail. Nora Ephron may have hit
the jackpot with "Sleepless in Seattle," and I am also an admirer of her
underrated 1994 comedy, "Mixed Nuts," but "You've Got Mail," ultimately,
fails to add anything new or worthwhile into the now worn-out romantic
comedy genre.
- Copyright 1998 by Dustin Putman
< <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/FilmFan16/index.html">Dustin Putman's Film Reviews</A> >
Originally posted in the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup. Copyright belongs to original author unless otherwise stated. We take no responsibilities nor do we endorse the contents of this review.
