What's wrong with LOTR?

Started by [\/]Y PR3c!ou$3 pages

caline, so wut if it wasn't middle earthy like [if thats wut you call it], it was a cool move. did you haf a problem when he did that move getting on the horse when they were fighting the orcs near helms deep? it wasn't middle earthy either was it...why would you say that it was a way to get teenage boys to like a movie? lots of ppl thought that move was cool, not onli teenage boys...adults liked it, kids liked and so did old ppl. your just to picky, its only one move, its not like he didn't for every fighting scene was it?

boy dont get all defensive here. i totally get what smeagol is saying. how in the world would uruk-hai know what a menu is after all i highly doubt any of them went into a place to eat and ordered off a menu. but you are right i enjoyed it emensly, and because they are my most favorite films i kind of look over them with a finer toothed comb then any other movie.

i knwo wut he means....i'm not stupid...but like that qoute was put in as a reason... form that qoute you can tell that the uruk-kai are like to eat meat and are barbaric [ if you want to put it that way]. but its not like the qoute destroyed the whole movie. and who would listen so carefully if they like the movie...its like who cares..its a mistake get over it...wut does he do? listen ever so carefully while watching the movie...how can a person enjoy a movie?

I am respondong to "Another Smithy's" comments about the Lord of the Rings book. You say that it is not as astounding as SOME have said. I am afraid that you are mistaken because EVERYONE with any sort of knowledge and appreciation of brilliant literature will say that the Lord of the Rings is one of the most in depth and detailed books ever written. Tolkien's style of writing is so painstakingly precise and meticulous that it feels more like a historical documentary than a work of fiction. So please, dont mistake your own inferiority for the book's.

ok you guys i dont agree w/some of the things that have been said either, but we dont need to shoot people because of their opinions. they have a right to think that, and you can say you disagree, but you dont need to call them complete idiots because of it.

billy has a point here.

<hege: I agree with you that LOTR is probably the best book ever written but smithy is entitled to his own opinion on the matter no reason to attack him

yo " billyboyd4ever" tell us who your directing your opinion to?

(smithy) wut do you mean the book mostly focused on pippin and merry. IN the FOTR the book was basically focused on Frodo and Sam wasn't it? in the TTT it was mostly focused on Aragron. so basically each book is mostly focused on a different character..rite? 🀨

and in ROTK?

Originally posted by billyboyd4ever
ok you guys i dont agree w/some of the things that have been said either, but we dont need to shoot people because of their opinions. they have a right to think that, and you can say you disagree, but you dont need to call them complete idiots because of it.

I agree with you. Everybody has the right to their own opinion. if we all liked and disliked the same things it would be a pretty boring world. Not everyone who reads the LOTR trilogy is going to like it. I absolutely hated the FOTR the first time i read it. the only reason i read the rest of the books was because i wanted to know what happened after i saw the first movie and didn't want to wait. After i read it a second time i still didn't like the FOTR as much as the other two books. so does that mean my opinion of the book is wrong?? i don't think so. People think differently then others do. So stop bringing people down on their opinions

actually "fire" its mostly focused on pippin and merry. in the book it doesn't talk about frodo and sam very much except when they're in shelob's home. and of course when they're about to destroy the ring. the book is mostly about the great battle of middle earth. [ remember the ppl on sauron side think that pippin has the ring][ merry is a soldier in the great battle] πŸ˜›

yo apple daisy. i'm not picking a fight here and all but there's lots of ppl disagreeing about other ppl's opinions thats why you tell ppl why you think its wrong...there's no rule that says you can't disagree with other ppl's opinion. so tell me exactly wut you trying to tell me. that no one should ever tell someone that they're is wrong. lots of ppl haf there freedom to say wutever they want. unless you think thats bad.

freedom of speech isn't bad. It's when you are putting people down for their opinion like Hegemon875 did when he said:

"You say that it is not as astounding as SOME have said. I am afraid that you are mistaken because EVERYONE with any sort of knowledge and appreciation of brilliant literature will say that the Lord of the Rings is one of the most in depth and detailed books ever written...... So please, dont mistake your own inferiority for the book's."

That's what i'm talking about. saying someone is wrong because they don't like the same thing you do. Hegemon875 basically said that if you don't like LOTR trilogy then you are stupid.

we've had worse

so apple daisy what you mean is that if ppl say things that they think are wrong it's puttin down ppls opinions? isn't that wut the person thinks of wut someone else thinks?

let me give you an example, since i don't think you get wut i mean.

lets say, i say that your dumb and stupid...than someone else says that your not; does that mean that person is putting down someone's opinion? i think that's just the persons opinion.😠

so don't go blabbering about wut ppl can't say or not say[ your not their mother]..it's their "opinion" remember!
so basically wut i'm writing is my own "opinion" right? i don't agree with you is that putting someone down...i don't think so at all...i bet you've been disagreeing things with ppl, so does that mean your putting down their opinion.? tell me that. so next time i don't think you should tell ppl wut to say or not to say. 😠

ppl cool it

you can not be putting someone down, even if it si your opinion

you will not be allowed to be verbaly abusive to ppl so NO name calling OK?

shut up fire..who's name calling it called an example...and no one is puttig ppl down its called opinion.

look I've seen abusive language in this thread

and I advise everyone not to do it again

you have the right to an opinion you do however NOT have the right to be abusive to other ppl

exactly. it's alright to have an opinion as long as it's not putting someone down or calling them stupid, or whatever.

ya damit peeple! quit yer bein jerks and bichin damit!