hmmph, y did they have to make harry potter movies @ all?

Started by Darth Sauron3 pages

Erm...they wanted to cash in

If a film is either

a) based on a best seling book
2) Controversial
g) full of robots...

It will sell, even if it is shit...

I mean I love all the movies & all the books...even tho everyone knows the books are better I still watch them lol when I can ๐Ÿ˜„ 1, 2 and 3 ๐Ÿ˜‰

Its just all about high expectations....i mean if JKR didnt create the books but someone created the HP movies wouldnt you think that there the best movies ever...cuz i would ๐Ÿ˜„

exactly
High expectations ruin everything

Look at SW ep-1

Originally posted by Auror Chk
do you think if you werent a HP book fan and you didnt read all the books that the movies you critisize would have been looked at in another way instead of being looked at as boring and suckful? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ just asking.....

I don't understand the question. Can you re-phrase it please?

I personally was satisfied with how the movies were created. I loved the books, but I never get my hopes up about anything, and I didn't completely hate the movies.

I mean lets just say you hadnt read a single HP book b4...

but you went to the movies and watched HP 1, 2 & 3..

would you feel the same way like how youve felt if you were a HP book reader???

In my opinion i loved all the HP movies...i have them all on dvd & PoA on Computer....and I am a book reader aswell!!

But i totally agree with you not getting your hopes up...when it comes to the JKR books & movies its best not to get your hopes up... ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

Yep I agree

i too am happy with both the movies and the books

if they do all 7 that will be awesome

the same here. I mean its too much to expect that a movie could ever reach a book. The books would always be better, and there is no movie that can portray completelly and authntically a book. The HP movies were a great experience to see how the characters that I imagined were chosen by the directors and how the events were portrayed in the movies compared to my head

yup it wud i think it be stupid if they justed made 5 films and stopped cuz really for them that havent read it . it wud finish in the middle really

there stopping after 5 thats not fair

ive not read the books i go off the films there awesome

true they make it easier to put a face to the character

Re: hmmph, y did they have to make harry potter movies @ all?

Originally posted by zelda_girl
: (who had ever heard of Rupert Grind and Emma Watson before HP?),

Wow. . . new actors????? -_- i'm sure nobody had heard of Orlando Bloom before Lotrs came out either, or Julia Roberts before Pretty Women

i dont care if there not like the books its something too look forward too isnt it every year

Originally posted by Darth Sauron
Erm...they wanted to cash in

If a film is either

a) based on a best seling book
2) Controversial
g) full of robots...

It will sell, even if it is shit...

lol a 2 g?

lol

and the actors are getting better every movie

most def

emma watson is a nice girl i think ๐Ÿ™‚