DareDevil better than Spiderman

I know a lot of people r gonna disagree ith me, but i think Daredevil was a better film than Spiderman. It had a better cast, soundtrack and storyline. Ok so it was too short and they killed off the sexy character, but I just found Daredevil more believable and less sugar coated.
😄

Spider-Man was/is and always be better than Daredevil in my opinion. Plus, the story was more solid and had better actors.

daredevil is garbage, it shows how superhero movies can fail and fail miserably. Bad dialogue and character development makes for a bad bad bad movie

I gotta disagree-- Spiderman is much better!

well, i did say people were gonna disagree wid me.

peter parker also had real life situations to deal with too, not just dd.

daredevil is a great character possibly one of the best and he always dealt with real life situations they were more from a mans point of view though rather than a teenager or early 20's kid to me the movie was just done all wrong especially the actors they casted

c'mon! sum 1 out theres gotta agree wit me!!!

but more teens were able to relate to another teen.

While my girlfriend thinks Daredevil was better, I don't think so. I think Spider-Man is a great movie. The only problem I had with Daredevil is that they tried to fit too many interesting characters into one movie i.e. Elektra, Kingpin, and Bullseye. And the fact that Kingpin was basically made to look like a little *****. He was defeated so easily it really made the character look like crap. Although I must say that Colin Farrel was awesome as Bullseye. Very funny guy.

Anyway, Spider-Man is quite possibly the best super hero movie ever. I've always been loyal to Batman, but I'm not so sure.

Spider-Man is better but Daredevil's good too but the dialogue is bad.

i rather did enjoy daredevil, it seemed deeper and darker than daredevil, but some of the un nessecary or shaky scenes let it down a little, but it had a good plot development

where as spiderman was basically flawless when it came to how strong the scens were it just seemed it was being like safe by being uniform and not goign for too much

but dare devil definately isnt on my bad books

I thought Spiderman was much better than Daredevil.

Same here. I didn't really like the Dare Devil costume and Ben Affleck couldn't really act in that movie. So I prefer Spiderman! Dum de dum...

Daredevil was too dark. The covered Afflacks lack of moves and acrobatics with darkness. Also Aflack's not broad shouldered enough to be Daredevil and his legs are too skinny. Plus DD would have caught that knife thrown at electra's dad. They underestimated DD's powers while they were acurate to Spideys strength speed and power. DD was a waste it could have and should have been way better. Hulk was a great movie as well except for all the biology crap. Banner was a Physicist not a biologist. They screwed up his origin.

i had some problems with dare devil,now don't get me wrong i liked it, buti didn't like how dark daredevil was...and bullseye was never crazy he killed for money thats it...i grew up reading comics in the 70's and 80's i don't like my heros killing...but all in all yes a good movie better then spidey no

I liked DD better than spidey but accept that as a film, spidey was more solid and character based.Granted DDs character developed too, from violent and flawed to slightly less so.I'm a DD fan, he's the best as far as I'm concerned but I wish they'd have done some stuff better.Affleck was good really, brooding and mean. they should have explained how Elektra is so tough(ninja past) and the kingpin is sucha tough combatant(should have shown him training over the years and shown his horrible childhood, first murder at 13). the biggest mistake was leaving stick out.'stick' for those of you who don't know, was DDs yoda, a blindman who was also a ninja and taught young Matt to use his supersenses. They could have showed 'Maggie'-Matt's mum who left him and his dad to become a nun, confronting him in hospital with the comforting words 'this is a gift from god, it can be our secret' like she did in the 'bornagain story line'. Despite all this, DD was still better than spidey coz it was more grown up and kick-arse. The bit with battle-scarred/broken hearted Matt after a night's work was perfect and so were the acrobatic/fighting scenes. The jumps he made were fine, he is an olympic level athlete and all the jumps were from high to low, making it possible to cover the distances. his hair could have been more proper red.what else?........oh yeah, the directors cut is out in April apparantly and it's 30mins longer with more plot lines that seemed missing.And its an 18/R rating meaning more grown up issues.
THE MAN WITHOUT FEAR ROCKS!

Maguire showed he's a better actor than Affleck. Both costumes kicked butt. Dafoe as the goblin did a much better job than Michael Clark Duncan. The story was developed better, and the action sequences in Spiderman were fluent as opposed to the riggidness of DD. Spidey owns DD!

I hate the DD movie where the f@ck was Stick the made Matt teach him self to fight wtf Ben Can't act I mean Affleck can not act the movie was killing the name of DareDevil and that kick to the legs he gave Kingpin would not have beat him the hole movie sucked bad I mean the acting was so bad they left to much out the story sucked.I wanted the hole Marvel DVD collection But DD put a stop to that the Hulk too if I did get DD I would have to shot my self.Spider-man and X-2 are the best comic movies DD is one of the worst movies ever not just comic movies any movies DareDevil suck bad!Why are they making DD 2?

i liked dardevil better