I don't think it will work, but ok. Just put "www." in front of it.
pictures.ask.com/redir?bpg=http%3a%2f%2fpictures.ask.com%2fpictures%3fq%3dGAMBIT%26o%3d0%26page%3d14&q=GAMBIT&u=http%3a%2f%2fpbem-portal.com%2forg%2fphoenix%2fx-men%2fpersonal%2fgambit%2findex.htm&s=p&bu=http%3a%2f%2fpbem-portal.com%2forg%2fphoenix%2fx-men%2fpersonal%2fgambit%2findex.htm&qte=0&o=0&isimageSearch=true&fromImagePage=False&iskey=&thumbsrc=http%3a%2f%2fimages.picsearch.com%2fis%3f820126624743&imagesrc=http%3a%2f%2fpbem-portal.com%2forg%2fphoenix%2fx-men%2fpersonal%2fgambit%2fimages%2fgambit-opening.gif&thumbwidth=128&thumbheight=47
Originally posted by BarmyBrummie
ethan hawke:
I don't know. Brian Singer went too far with the X-Men. He ruined the whole story line! The older X-Men aren't teachers, and the kids aren't taught in the institute. They're taught in a different school! In the movie Gambit's bio is that he's 18 and he's been living at the institute! It's such bullshit! The first movie was good, the second went a little too close to being too much, and the third one seems as if it's going to suck!
Originally posted by Gambit_DDR
In the movie Gambit's bio is that he's 18 and he's been living at the institute! It's such bullshit! The first movie was good, the second went a little too close to being too much, and the third one seems as if it's going to suck!
Where did you get that info? All I had in my movie was the name Remy Lebeau in Stryker's files.
I thought the 2nd movie was closer to the themes of the comic book than the first, it even borrowed imagery from the comic, and they trouble shot things like Kurt's skin, a cgi Kurt would have sucked majorly and the fur couldn't be done so they got the angelic tatts which I felt only added more to the complexity of Kurt.
The movie should have ended with the oresident giving his speech, I think everyone has had enough of emo cyclops for a milennia