We're experts at it.
Gundy, this place is in Spain somewhere and is no where near the standards of Sandals. It's a cheap, rip off, named for the association with the Jamaican resort, but actually not anything to do with it.
Shoeless, I have sen your many lurkings at the old place, far too many to know them all, but your hostory is not totally foriegn to us.
Neither do I, Shoe. But it's sort of a board passtime here to go off topic big time. Don't know who introduced that here. 🙄
Anyway, RC dropped by once in a while, not a big poster, not even a Beardi, so I'm sure you missed him. He was more a lurker there than a contributor. Just curious what the queeqster was up to in other places I suppose.
Well, make yourself comfortable, Shoe. Trim? If you wanna drink, check out my bar: the Hoth Tub Pub.
Hmmmm, well I knew of the other place before I knew of you queeq. Sorry to burst your bubble on that one.
I make few posts there, and mainly within the UK FF area so you'd probably have missed me Shoeless, but I am aware of you and the company in which you reside.
Anyway, welcome, make yourslef at home and enjoy.
I am sure Queeq can tell you my problems as well. But they are bsaically:
1. It doesn't stand rational analysis
2. Food theory is irrevelant to the PT where everyone will die whether they eat or not
3. I think you have mis-read GL's intentions.
4. It's not actually FINISHED... (the theory, that is, not the films)
Ah yes, I see....many common concerns of the untrained observer, but to understand the theory, you must unlearn what you have learned. Please excuse me for anything that may have already been said. Now let's take a moment and see....
1. It doesn't stand rational analysis
ummm, a bit vague, but I assure you, it stands perfectly rational analysis.
2. Food theory is irrevelant to the PT where everyone will die whether they eat or not
- It's relevent in that those we see eat we shall also see die. Granted it's hard to say at this point being that 2 films have yet to be seen, but unless Queeq, Keo, or Dim care to correct me, this theory holds strong so far.
3. I think you have mis-read GL's intentions.
- I assure you that we have not, so sure in fact that we can apply the theory to other creations of George Lucas'. You see, When the OT was made, George's beard ideas were in their infancy. This is evident in the lack of beards in the OT (thogh the theory is in effect, I'll clarify if need be) as well as the first 2 Indy movies which were made roughly around the time of late OT. By Last Crusade however, the theory was more fleshed out, as evident in the hefty beard George gave to Henry Jones Sr. Further evidence of this exists in the Young Indiana Jones episode, Mystery of the Blues in which Harrison Ford makes a cameo as an older, wiser Indy, complete with beard. The theory stands.
4. It's not actually FINISHED... (the theory, that is, not the films)
- Of course not. Though the theory is as finished as possible without having seen Episodes 2&3. The theory is complete, and I will be glad to explain any indiscrepencies you may feel exist 🙂
Look, the food thing is USELESS for the PT. You cannot make a link between eating and dying when EVERYONE dies. You could make an equally strong link between NOT eating and dying, or a link between wearing clothes and dying. Or breathing. Or simply being in the film.
Your arguments at your site don't withstand rational analysis because you twist everything to fit what you want.
And I think you have so badly misread GL's intentions that it is sad, but I have already argued this one out with Queeq; just ask him.