Spider-man movie should have been called manspider

Started by Mr Parker9 pages
Mr Parker Senior Member

Spider-man movie should have been called manspider

This piece of crap phony neatutered version of Sonys should have been called manspider.they totally betrayed his character and the comic by making him into a manspider monster giving him organics. 😠
You can go to hell sony for raping to death such a great character.

Kes Philie

The only thing they changed was the web.
In the comics he as a spider sensor right ? And climbs walls so..

bakerboy Senior Member

Yeah, mr Paker, that man spider crap cant be called spider man. Spidey is a guy with web shooters, and who is funny all the time. And the organics makes of him a freak, what a stupid idea.

Mr Parker Senior Member

To the first poster who replied, thats whats so dumb about it,is you just dont know what kind of a person he is anymore because of the freaking organics.I mean they have confused everybody for no damn good reason at all. 😠 I feel the same way,my state of mind is WHAT THE HELL? 😠

masterofmatrix Matrix Geezer

KEEP YOUR ****IN TEMPER DOWN. DONT MAKE A FUSS CLOSE THIS DOWN PLEASE

Mr Parker Senior Member

Originally posted by masterofmatrix
KEEP YOUR ****IN TEMPER DOWN. DONT MAKE A FUSS CLOSE THIS DOWN PLEASE

thumbs down sign.
Hey dude,I have a right to come here to complain and be pissed about how hollywood screwed up this movie and made him into a manspider monster as much as you do to just praise the film.and sorry dude,but I seriously doubt the administraters of this site are going to close thread down just because you dont like seeing somebody bash that stupid manspider movie of sonys. 😛 😆

Kes Philie
Originally posted by Mr Parker
To the first poster who replied, thats whats so dumb about it,is you just dont know what kind of a person he is anymore because of the freaking organics.I mean they have confused everybody for no damn good reason at all. 😠 I feel the same way,my state of mind is WHAT THE HELL? 😠

Yeh but the fact that he climbs walls already makes him genetically different 🙂
Plus its easy to "believe" that the web comes from his body instead of him making them in his room 😖

Mr Parker Senior Member
Originally posted by Kes
Yeh but the fact that he climbs walls already makes him genetically different 🙂
Plus its easy to "believe" that the web comes from his body instead of him making them in his room 😖

Heres the problem with that argument,there is no logical justification to believe the webbing would shoot out of his wrists instead of his ass if he gained the power to shoot out of his body. 🙄

Metroplex Senior Member

Who cares if they changed it. Doesnt really matter the movie was great anyway.

Kes Philie
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Heres the problem with that argument,there is no logical justification to believe the webbing would shoot out of his wrists instead of his ass if he gained the power to shoot out of his body. 🙄

Oh well still better then him actually inventing something like a web and making it in his room 🙂

bakerboy Senior Member

That is an stupid excuse, because there are many bizarre and unveliable things in the movie , peter creating a high tech costume, a guy with the spider powers with only a bite of a spider, a guy geting super strenght drinking a formula and flying in a glideder, etc, etc. All the spiderman things are unvelieble in the same way or more unvelieble than peter creating his own web, so why are those things in the movie and not the web shooters?

Mr Parker Senior Member

Originally posted by Metroplex
Who cares if they changed it. Doesnt really matter the movie was great anyway.

Whether you realize this or not,thousands of fans cared and to hell it doesnt matter.Hes a monster now and its only great if your a manspider fan and not a spiderman fan anymore. 😆

CaptainInsano Restricted

He's not a monster, he's a superhero with genetically, altered, super powers! Hulk is a monster. But Spider-man is a mutant because he was bit by the spider. I am also sorta pissed about him not having web shooters but they didn't ruin the franchise. And what the hell are you talking about (manspider) moron.

masterofmatrix Matrix Geezer

ok heres why they didnt put webshooters in the movie.

1. the web carterages would be a waste of money since the web was cgi anyway

2. the whole movie would have been about peter making them if they had web carterages

Kes Philie

Originally posted by bakerboy
That is an stupid excuse, because there are many bizarre and unveliable things in the movie , peter creating a high tech costume, a guy with the spider powers with only a bite of a spider, a guy geting super strenght drinking a formula and flying in a glideder, etc, etc. All the spiderman things are unvelieble in the same way or more unvelieble than peter creating his own web, so why are those things in the movie and not the web shooters?

Well quimicals and radiation..But making a web in is room 😖

Ushgarak Paladin

Sigh... purirsts- always irritating people, also people who are irritatED because the film did so damn well which suggests to me that the makers did nothing wrong.

Kes Philie

Aside from CaptainInsano nobody sounded irritated.
Only Mr. Parker but at the movie makers 😉

Ushgarak Paladin

Point stands. You cannot expect the movie to be like the film in all respects; the makers felt having him able to naturally shoot web worked better and I cannot see any reason that convinces me this was a bad thing. People should just learn to seperate source and film; it's the same problem with Lord of the Rings.

Kes Philie

Well but Mr. Parker didnt like it. Thats the point.

carnage713 Senior Member
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Heres the problem with that argument,there is no logical justification to believe the webbing would shoot out of his wrists instead of his ass if he gained the power to shoot out of his body. 🙄

maybee im wrong but peter was bit on the wrists that mite have sumthing to do w/ it. and dude chill out defy spidy as a monster for me