I reckon non-active should be someone who hasn't posted in over two months ((that amount of time should allow for holidays etc))
for example, there are people on the first page who haven't posted in nearly a year! whereas moi posts everyday!
MAH
mahJ-type 327 Nubian
Nah, you can't say someone with thousands of posts is non-active because of a three-month absence.
Lovely graphs btw, GP
YER
yerssotSenior Member
Originally posted by Phoenix whereas moi posts everyday!
we weren't complaining 😉
GP
G.Pliving bank advertisement
😖 Except Lance, no one told me, how many posts does a member need to be considered as active...for I don't think 11000 + is a right answer...
YER
yerssotSenior Member
200?
LAN
LanceWinduSenior Member
Maybe 100-200.
FIR
FireSenior Member
I'd go for this:
you make a post per day count, and everyone who has about +0.75 posts per day is considered active imo
FUN
fungrl515Senior Member
gosh, you're smart. i don't wanna do math out of my class.
YER
yerssotSenior Member
best is if you check the last post and then go to the amount of posts they have, I mean, some who posted a big while ago but not anymore could with the idea of FM still be counted as active
FIR
FireSenior Member
well those are very few anywayz and you can also take into account the last post date. to rule out any exceptions to the +0.75 Pp.D count
GP
G.Pliving bank advertisement
That's a very good idea Fire
YER
yerssotSenior Member
he partly got it from me 😛 *desperate for credits* and I invented the mobile phone too!
GP
G.Pliving bank advertisement
Wow 😱
LAN
LanceWinduSenior Member
I invented the internet.
YER
yerssotSenior Member
belgian invention lance 😛 (combined with the swiss)
LAN
LanceWinduSenior Member
Those damn Belgians!!!
Why'd they have to go and make the waffle internet?