but for those that don't have enter the matrix, etc
i loved the second film. it wasn't as well shot as number one or as coherent, and certain scenes (the speech and dance - the blackout - the multiple smith fight) were really badly paced and too pompous.
most of what they were saying was either much less amazing than they made it out to be or else more complicated and really needed fleshing out.
so my point is, for those who haven't read the comic, seen all the animatrices and played the game from start to end, is this all going to tie up? if there are things vital we've missed, maybe someone could post what they are?
parts of the film felt like you were expected to know too much. i'd seen flight of the osirisis and knew about the break-in scene so the start didn't baffle me, but all my mates came out going what the hell? the first film really explained everything whilst leaving lots of questions. i know that was part 2 so its hard to judge, but the wachs need to bear in mind those without ps2's or a degree in baudrillard
ps. check out ghost in the shell - wonder where they got some of their ideas from....
:-)