Let's talk about Conspiracy Theories!!

sorry...I just dont believe it, there's something not right about it that's all.

Hmm... well, ok, but you'll forgive me for wanting proof (or at least evidence) it didn't happen...

yeah ok, i just dont believe it and everyone us intitled to their opinions

Doesn't necessarily make those opinions valid though...

look at this picture....
( photo clearly shows shadow of flag, but shadow of "Astro-not" is absent).

HMMMM. plus look at the flag...breeze? I doubt it's still unsettled!

hey that photo does luk kinda fake,look at his right leg-its on the ground but it luks like it shunt be,its hard to explain,just luk at his right leg and u'll see.im undecided about wether its a hoax or not

yeah like the guy has been stuck on or summit
hey thats it the astronot has been stuck onto the pic, that would explain no shadow!!!

The shadow is actually there and I can see it. There is a slight downslope or more like a pit right where he is standing so you cannot see the ground where the shadow would be. Part of the shadow is visible toward the very right of the picture though.

Or, if he is actually jumping in the air, his shadow would not be visible especially with the sun at that angle.

First of all, yes, Tired Hiker is right, there is a shadow, look more closely next time.

The shadows in the picture are not 100% parrallel and with a low sun they are not easy to see. The astronaut's shadow is moving away and right. You can see it to the right of the foot on our right, his left. This is perfectly normal and in keeping with how might works when a photo is viewed without perspective- the astronaut is on a slope and this is obscuring and slightly re-directing his shadow in the picture. Look here:

http://www.apollo-hoax.co.uk/strangeshadows.html

You see non-parralel shadows every day on Earth, just people don't think about it.

Second, err, no NOT a breeze,. Why do you think there is a breeze? Like I say, the flag is like a curtain- it is rung from a horizontal rod at the top. Ripples do NOT mean a breeze any more than they do with a curtain! And if you think the flag is waving, where the heck do you think this was shot? Inside? How strong IS that air conditioning? Outside? If the wind is strong enough to blow the flag, it would blow the dust also. In either case, the whole flag would flap. In that picture the top of the flag is clearly rigid- because, as I say, it is hung from a rail.

That is a genuine photo, nothing wrong with it at all. And trust me, if NASA had faked the pic, they would have faked the shadow, it is piss easy to do so. And just what would be the point of superimposing an astronaut when, if you think this is a conspiracy, they would have just put the fake astronaut on the fake moon and taken the picture? In fact, just what do you think is going on at ALL with trying to make out the shadows are wrong? Presumably that the pic is a composite- why bother if you have a convincing fake set? It makes no sense. In any case, the picture is good.

It's nonsense, all of it. The landings were real.

The thing that still gets me about the first moon landing was…..What the hell was with the crape movie cameras this was NASA in the late 60’s they where getting more money from the government then anything else in the world but they couldn’t find themselves a better camera?? In 1969 movie cameras where far more advanced then the once they used on the first moon landing. Why would they want the picture to look kind of crape and fuzzy? Is it because its harder to see what’s really going on…and in the later landing all the cameras where updated. WHY because maybe the first one took place in the Nevada desert….

and why isint the Lunar Lander covered in dust?? That thing must have been very heavy I bet it wasn’t a super soft landing so why is there no dust on the thing??

Maybe because they had to use a special kind of camera? And no, they weren't that good. My grandparents had film of my mom when she was 4 and it was crappy just like the fuzzy moon-landing imaging.

You're all Paranoid....

doodoodooooodoododoodoooodooo
😛

Indeed! 😄

First of all, do you know how DIFFICULT it was to get decent camera footage of the moon? It was hideously technical!

Secondly, have you ever seen a helicopter land? Downthrust blows stuff AWAY, not up. If a helicopter lands on a dust bowl, not a piece of dust would get on it.

However, besides that, there is no air on the moon. Dust has to be pjysically touched by the exhaust to be displaced- the actual amount of dust shifted was very small.

i saw documentary on it 😖
i think its a hoax very long explanation 😄

Try me. It's not a hoax- or at least, you cannot prove it.

alright they have the theory that well in pictures of the moon landing theere appears to be a second light source other from the sun which up there would be the only source of light......
also one picture was taken in one location.......and days later another picture was taken very far away from the first yet the look exactly alike as if they were taken in the same place.........
and the shadows and the rock shadows do not match the way the sun hits them.............
and very smart scientists have proven that back then radiation could have very highly affected the astronauts causing them great problems.....
i hve some more points but i have the thing taped must watch again 😄