If u had a chance to do one celebrity, which would it be ?

Started by ~Bun Bun~6 pages

That is what's sad. Girls who claim to have a Bi curious stage or fad. I understand but, it makes the rest of us who truly know who we are, look confused or selfish.

So a little fyi, I am in that 1%.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
That's your opinion. Mine is different.

No, that's not my opinion. That's a fact well established in human sexual behavior. Kinsey Institute has dedicated decades of research on the matter. You'd think they know a bit more about it than you do, right?

What is not fact is your opinion. 👆

Originally posted by ~Bun Bun~
That is what's sad. Girls who claim to have a Bi curious stage or fad. I understand but, it makes the rest of us who truly know who we are, look confused or selfish.

So a little fyi, I am in that 1%.

Forgive me if I don't believe you... It should be of little consequence though. My opinion on the legitimacy of your sexuality really shouldn't bother you. All that matters is that you are secure in your own sexuality, and that those who are intimate with you also are.

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, that's not my opinion. That's a fact well established in human sexual behavior. Kinsey instituted has dedicated decades of research on the matter. You'd think they know a bit more about it than you do, right?

What is not fact is your opinion. 👆

Donnie notworthy

Originally posted by dadudemon
Actually, almost all humans are bisexual. It's just that we almost all fall somewhere closer to one side or the other.

😐

Bulltshit. I haven't even though about doing a man........ Well maaaaybe Ryan Reynolds.

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, that's not my opinion. That's a fact well established in human sexual behavior. Kinsey instituted has dedicated decades of research on the matter. You'd think they know a bit more about it than you do, right?

What is not fact is your opinion. 👆

Kinsey has come under a lot of criticism for his theories about innate bisexuality. It's theoretical.. not fact.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Forgive me if I don't believe you... It should be of little consequence though. My opinion on the legitimacy of your sexuality really shouldn't bother you. All that matters is that you are secure in your own sexuality, and that those who are intimate with you also are.

This is why I don't debate 😑

Lisa Bonet was hot back in the day, she's still pretty hot now.

but i would.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Kinsey has come under a lot of criticism for his theories about innate bisexuality. It's theoretical.. not fact.

No, it's fact, not theoretical. And, the entirety of the work come under any sort of legitimate criticism, but indidvidual studies have and will always, not just ones done by the Kinsey Institute. Stop pretending you're not wrong. You were blatantly wrong.

If at any point, a human is turned on by the same sex, that automatically "adds" a point to the sliding scale of sexuality..one notch closer to bisexual.

Check this out: you could have a Ph.D. in human sexology (it exists) and you'd still be wrong. 🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, it's fact, not theoretical. And, the entirety of the work come under any sort of legitimate criticism, but indidvidual studies have and will always, not just ones done by the Kinsey Institute. Stop pretending you're not wrong. You were blatantly wrong.

If at any point, a human is turned on by the same sex, that automatically "adds" a point to the sliding scale of sexuality..one notch closer to bisexual.

petpet You need to learn how science works. Especially when it comes to psychology, it's all theory.

There has also been legitimate criticism... On the sample sizes are make up.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
petpet You need to learn how science works. Especially when it comes to psychology, it's all theory.

Whew: glad sexual acts aren't a pure measure of "psychology" then, right? awesome

You need to learn how science works: your opinion is definitely wrong.

Caught your edit.

Ahhh, so you don't actually addres my rebuttal to your point at all and instead, choose to ignore it. hmm

Originally posted by dadudemon
Whew: glad sexual acts aren't a pure measure of "psychology" then, right? awesome

You need to learn how science works: your opinion is definitely wrong.

Caught your edit.

Ahhh, so you don't actually addres my rebuttal to your point at all and instead, choose to ignore it. hmm

Bisexuality cannot be determined as biological (at least not yet)... just like homosexuality can't. There is no gay gene, hormone levels have proven inconclusive. Until there is any substantial evidence that confirms it's in biology I will continue to think it's psychological. This is not to say that it's chosen.

None.

Unless if we are counting pornstars...

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Bisexuality cannot be determined as biological (at least not yet)... just like homosexuality can't. There is no gay gene, hormone levels have proven inconclusive. Until there is any substantial evidence that confirms it's in biology I will continue to think it's psychological. This is not to say that it's chosen.

Yes it can and has.

Yes homosexuality can and has.

It seems you know little to nothing of human sexuality.

With ignorant statements such as "bisexuality is lies!", it's fairly easy to see that.

No worries, though. I still think you're a really smart fella. There's a plethora of things you know (useful academic things) that I have no clue about. I just wanted to put it out there that you were dead wrong. I'd expect the same if I were wrong about something so blatantly.

Originally posted by JacopeX
None.

Unless if we are counting pornstars...

I count them as celebs.
So go for it.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes it can and has.

Yes homosexuality can and has.

It seems you know little to nothing of human sexuality.

With ignorant statements such as "bisexuality is lies!", it's fairly easy to see that.

No worries, though. I still think you're a really smart fella. There's a plethora of things you know (useful academic things) that I have no clue about. I just wanted to put it out there that you were dead wrong. I'd expect the same if I were wrong about something so blatantly.

I was just being a dick when I said bisexuality was a fallacy. Although I do believe in a lot, if not most cases it is attention seeking though, certainly amongst the younger crowd..

As for homosexuality being genetic or not we could debate it for hours and get no where. There simply isn't enough evidence to support anyone's claims. Certainly no proof.

its a evolutionary dead end. its mothers nature of saying your being plucked from the tree.

Famke Janssen, i don't care that shes 45. droolio

Originally posted by §P0oONY
I was just being a dick when I said bisexuality was a fallacy. Although I do believe in a lot, if not most cases it is attention seeking though, certainly amongst the younger crowd..

As for homosexuality being genetic or not we could debate it for hours and get no where. There simply isn't enough evidence to support anyone's claims. Certainly no proof.

i ****ing hate kids. Attention whores.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes it can and has.

Yes homosexuality can and has.

It seems you know little to nothing of human sexuality.

With ignorant statements such as "bisexuality is lies!", it's fairly easy to see that.

No worries, though. I still think you're a really smart fella. There's a plethora of things you know (useful academic things) that I have no clue about. I just wanted to put it out there that you were dead wrong. I'd expect the same if I were wrong about something so blatantly.

Peenus and bewbz.