There is going to be a chang bummer i know. I started reading these book in 2001 after the first 4 were already out. I thought they were going to be dumb and babyish but I ended up missing school one day and when I came back there was only one book left to do for a Book Report!!! Harry Potter #1 so I got so in to that went to every library until I found the rest and read them. Then I waited 2and a half year for the fifth book then well you know the rest... 🙁
Well, I'm pretty sure the directors, producers, and the screen writer know that Hermoine and Ron are more likely to be a couple in the future books than Hermoine and Harry. JK Rowling talks to them about this kind of stuff. So the Hermoine flirting you see in the movie is just Emma and Dan...
Anyway, about the books... OBVIOUSLY, I love the books way better than the movies. There will always be something left out in the movies. But I totally agree with airangel about the whole Harry/Ginny things you see in the books if you read between the lines, compare to the movies which only focus too much on the trio (I say, way too much on Hermoine 🙄 since they're trying to promote the whole "girl power" in my opinion)...
But YES, they should've atleast added more foreshadowing of Harry and Ginny in the movies as the books have. I'm not assuming Harry and Ginny are going to be together, but I think they should've done the valentines' card scene with Harry in the 2nd movie (because I believe that's how Harry really found out how to work the diary.) Remember when he tries to run away from the valentines messenger, he tripped and spilled his ink all over his things, but the diary didn't get stained at all.. JKR also described how Ginny was flustered and looking embarrassed at the moment, and Malfoy teased Harry and Ginny. And also the platform scene with Ginny and Harry in the 1st, because that's how we find out that Ginny had a crush on Harry since the beginning of the series... They didn't even add these in the deleted scenes. And it really have pissed me off.
thats along time im am always reading and going to book stores but i suppose that the cover makes it look bit childish no offense but thats problee why i didnt buy it but after the first movies i was hooked but then after the first book i was bi wilded sounds corny i know laugh if u will but i really like the books and the movies.
i saw the movies the other day abit let down but i was still content with what i saw
yah i totally agree that some things in the movies r messed up, like in poa book when harry is on the knight bus the conducter asked what his name was adn he said neville and so the conducter talks about harry potter and when they get 2 the leaky cauldren the minster come onto the bus and is all like harry and the conducter is like that was harry potter im mad 😠 that they changed that that could of been a good part also i would rather have the books but occasionally a little eye candy wouldnt be bad would it? 😉
DANIEL RADCLIFFE HOTTEST THING EVER!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by crazy_ci HIGHLY doubt that they will for the simple fact of this:
I dont think harry and hermy will git 2getha
in an interview on the 2nd movie w/ jkr she talks about poa & tells about some of the things to expect & wat they might foreshadow & hermoine & RON is one of those things. she says that in the 3rd movie u start to see more of a connection between ron & hermoine (such as hermione getting ready to grab his hand during COMC class & watching macnair slice up wat they thought was buckbeak she cuddled up to RON...NOT HARRY) jkr says that these connections actually dont pop up until the 4th book (talking about ron's jealousy @ the yule ball) jkr herself pointed these little tidbits out in her interview, yes she has barely written about them in her books, and movies need some sort of chemistry foreshadowing & that chemistry seems to b leaning towards ron & hermione