Curl_Up&Dye
Pretty in Pink
Ay,
The movie did suck. What you really have to understand though is that all the Stephen King books that were made into movies sucked. Mostly because of two factors:
1. Either by the director's "creative" vision or copyright infringement issues that branch from Stephen King disagreeing with the director's creative interpretation. Copyright issues force the director to add/cut certain scenes to keep the movie within the agreed on copyright boundaries. For the most part this affects the movie in a profoundly negative way, but the show must go on and the director is forced to make due with what restrictions and leeway they have with a film.
2. The movie strays completely from the original intent of the book. This is kind of the result of the first scenario. If you read Pet Semetary, Carrie, Tommyknockers...etc (the list goes on and on), and then watch the movie, you'll notice that there are very drastic changes in the story's plot. This is what I like to call the "Lite-Beer Watered-Down Effect".
Carrie is a perfect example of book-to-movie gone awry. The casting was great, but the plot is what killed the movie. Carrie's retaliation is one scene that I find to be a significant part of the plot. In the book, after Carrie is humiliated at her prom, she goes out and demolishes practically the whole town, killing hundreds of people and exploding gas tanks with downed power lines. Stephen King's horrific genius was tampered with ("watered down"😉 in the movie. Carrie retaliates by burning down the high school gym, killing probably around...100 extras and John Travolta. Not as exciting ay?
However, the mistakes made in the original movie version of Carrie were corrected in the remake (2000-01 maybe), as this version remained faithful to the book.
💃