The Jedi/Maul battle - Why didn't Obi Wan use...

I think you'll find that most people agree with me. And it's not MY theory. I got it from Jedinet. Until the i'd never even thought about this.

But after hearing the "he was too tired" explanation and the "it was too dangerous" one, there is only ONE explanation as far as I'm concerned. It's the only one that makes sense and MOST topics about this on other boards say the same. You and Yerssot are the only two people I've ever seen who has a problem with it.

I'm not trying to convince you I'm right. Beleive what you like. But don't try and pick holes in it and say it's "entirley unconvincing" when it is.

Actually, I think you won't find most people agree with you. I think you will find most people don't care, and those that do will find little to chose between the two.

It is your arguments that are unconvincing, not the theory itself. The idea that he was asking to be killed my Maul if he ran in there simply does not scan.

look at OB1's face when he hangs on the walkway when he pulls himself back on it, you get a close-up of his face, and he is swetting... maybe an indication that he is tired?

And in any case, if speeding out of the gate walkway was too dangerous, what about speeding INTO it? Why did he not speed down half or three quarters of it? He only needed to be a split second faster and he would have been through, and there is no threat from Maul and the it INSIDE the corridor, and he would have been too fast for the gates to be a problem!

No. He COULD not do it. That is the only feasible reason for him not to have done it; not any danger invovled.

Listen, believe what you like. I know I'm right and so do all the other people from other boards who say the EXACT same thing. If you think there was "no danger" then you need you're head read and I can't help with that. Sorry.

And since you've got rediculous with "it's your arguments that unconvincing, not the theory itself" (which is the same thing) I've decided to leave this one. So find someone else to argue with. I'm off to force-speed my way through energy doors! 😄

KJ, you gave your evidence why your theory was correct, we posted stuff that explained all those stuff. Leaving nothing behind I think, and than you have the theory that I accept that comes from the second best official source: sw.com......

No. There is STILL only one explanation.

But I don't want to talk about this anymore. 😄

ofcourse there is only one and only one explanation that is correct, which one? A third perhaps?

Okay, so we now seem to have de-generated to cat fighting over different answers.

I started this one and so I'm fishing it.

Thank you all for your input, it was all gratefully recieved.

Whizz, bang, whoosh and we're outta here!!!