Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I heard in the people mazine the stories her bodyguard told.He is afraid of her being alone with the kids in the pool or whatever because she is nuts.
Also she has supervister vists when she does get the kids.Pretty interesting stuff.jm
I don't believe what her ex bodyguard says.
Originally posted by InnerRise
I do.His testimony was crucial, if not the most important to the case and is one of the prime reasons Britany's kids got taken away.
He was an actual eye witness to the terrible parenting.
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
For someone that allegedly feared for those children's lives then their was no reason for him to wait four or five months. He should've said something a long time ago. Also what HE said wasn't crucial at all, it was Britney's own ignorance at not adhering to the courts rulings that lead to her children being taken away.
Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
I don't believe what her ex bodyguard says.
It was her ex bodyguard?I did not see that.I guess he could be lieing.After all most movie star singer mazines are half the truth anyway.
But still interested to read.I believe it was at this month mazine too.If anyone had seen it.jm 🙂
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It was her ex bodyguard?I did not see that.I guess he could be lieing.After all most movie star singer mazines are half the truth anyway.
But still interested to read.I believe it was at this month mazine too.If anyone had seen it.jm 🙂
Yes it was. I tend not to believe someone that waits months and then all of a sudden comes out and lays a bunch of claims on someone. IF this man really truly believed that those kids were in some of danger, then why in the world would you wait a few months to say something. Thats very fishy. Anywhoo, the only thing I've seen on Brit today is that she has apparently mended fences with her mother and sister. Thats a real good thing there.
Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUSWell he was working for her.
For someone that allegedly feared for those children's lives then their was no reason for him to wait four or five months. He should've said something a long time ago. Also what HE said wasn't crucial at all, it was Britney's own ignorance at not adhering to the courts rulings that lead to her children being taken away.
Why would he go against her while working for her? Doesn't make sense. This is why he waited. B/c he was fired and the reason was pretty ridiculous.
He was a man with a grudge and stuck it to her and her was a big part, this isn't opinion. The prosecutor/lawyer/whatever stated this.
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
Originally posted by InnerRise
Well he was working for her.Why would he go against her while working for her? Doesn't make sense. This is why he waited. B/c he was fired and the reason was pretty ridiculous.
He was a man with a grudge and stuck it to her and her was a big part, this isn't opinion. The prosecutor/lawyer/whatever stated this.
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
I will say it again, If this man feared for those kids lives, a person does not wait months to say something. It would have been very easy for him to go against her, it happens in the workplace each and everyday. That reason he gave for being fired was floppily at best. Perhaps, he was more fired because he couldn't do his job. Also the reason he gave for waiting was because he feared for his life and his kids lives. That is an even crappy arse reason especially sense the man protects celebs for a living., Yet he can't even protect his own family from the press, What a great bodyguard he wasn't.