Originally posted by Lord Soth
Sam Raimi excluded the chemical web shooters for a reason. He didn't think a high school student could come up with sometihgnthat complicated. And it's not that big a deal anyway, so grow up.Kes--->I don't know anything about Spawn, never got into him 😛
That argument is so laughable because there are things in that movie a lot more unbelievable than that.I bet if I was having this conversation with you when the first Punisher movie had been made and pointing out how stupid it was to make the movie without the skull on the chest,you'd be saying the same exact same thing trying to justify the skull not being on the chest and acting like a child telling me to grow up because of that. 🙄 😛 sounds like you need to grow up since you cant stand to hear how stupid it was to use organics.
You misunderstand. I don't care that they were made organic because it wasn't THAT big a part of the mythos. Now, if they excluded the webs althogether, that would something completely wrong, and I would be mad. Just like the skull on the Punisher's body armour. It's an important part of the character. The fact that the webshooters are organic instead of chemical isn't a big deal. The big deal is that the webshooters are THERE in the first place. So don't patronize me
Originally posted by Lord Soth
You misunderstand. I don't care that they were made organic because it wasn't THAT big a part of the mythos. Now, if they excluded the webs althogether, that would something completely wrong, and I would be mad. Just like the skull on the Punisher's body armour. It's an important part of the character. The fact that the webshooters are organic instead of chemical isn't a big deal. The big deal is that the webshooters are THERE in the first place. So don't patronize me
Patronize? You started the patronising with your grow up remark. 🙄 wrong again because it IS a big deal and an important part of his character.and you failed to address my question.Kes please close this thread before it gets any uglier.