nope, i played it for a half hour a few times.
im judging it because its not as much fun as normal cs, just like the people that played 1.5 said it was better than 1.6. its just because thats when they started playing. im a cs guy, not a cz guy. i know at least a handful of people that feel the exact same way as i do.
Originally posted by RedAlertv2Oh god a slower game? I died when i got counter-strike and realized how slow it was compared to quake3. I can not play worth crap on slow games. No way in hell im getting AA. lol
Anyone enjoy America's Army? CS is better but AA is a good change of pace. It is a lot slower, with more strategizing and time to think in battle, etc, and its a lot more realistic.Plus its free. Best part about that game
Hehe totaly agree with above, Quake 3 is sucha thrill cause of its speed, nothing like running trough the map with the plasma gun and with quad dmg 🙂 anyways CS, or CSS is just as real as I want a multiplayer 3 shooter game to be honestly, AA is no fun cause of its realisim, that and Delta Force is just to slow
Originally posted by The Highlord
Hehe totaly agree with above, Quake 3 is sucha thrill cause of its speed, nothing like running trough the map with the plasma gun and with quad dmg 🙂 anyways CS, or CSS is just as real as I want a multiplayer 3 shooter game to be honestly, AA is no fun cause of its realisim, that and Delta Force is just to slow
Two completely different games, in my opinion.
Comparring CS to Quake is like chalk and cheese.
I love both, because I always win.