explain this -spoiler-

Started by stinkfist4623 pages

explain this -spoiler-

when neo and bane were fighting and the orange smiht appeared... it showed that his head fell of.. but in the normal view.. his head was still in place..... ?

His head blew, that means smith died, he no longer existed in bane's body or mind. That also means that bane died.

Mr. Anderson couldn't hit hard enough to blow someone's head off. He was not in the matrix you know.

P.S.
Watch that part once again. Do you see bane wearing glasses or a suit. Why didn't you also ask about it? 😄

yeah, neo's a wimp in the real world

Originally posted by dave123
yeah, neo's a wimp in the real world
🤨 He still kicked a$$! Give him some credit! It's not easy to wipe Smith's head off and leave Bane's head on! I mean, poor Bane!.....It wasn't really his fault!

for someone that knows kung-fu and such, he sucked

He hadn't learnt how to pass his mental abilities onto his physical abilities yet I suppose!

lol... hey whoever smith takes over is the greatest!

Originally posted by dave123
yeah, neo's a wimp in the real world

Not necessarily a wimp, more like just a normal guy in the real world. Well, a normal guy with a few extra powers 😉 In the real world he doesn't have his Matrix powers...except for being able to 'sense' the sentinels...and recognize Bane as a Smith (though I don't see how he didn't figure it out earlier...how many people, exactly, call Neo 'Mr. Anderson'?)

i don't know what movie you watched, but his head was off in the real world too.

watch it again. bane has no head left. don't know what gave you the idea that he did have a head still.

kindly point out where bane's head is on this picture. 😐

i changed the brightness for clarity purposes.

You can't really see anything in that picture, in it Bane looks like he's missing part of an arm, which he wasn't. But I do believe I located where his head is, you can clearly see a shadowy part right in the spot where his head should go. Image attached has this circled. I tried to fix up the contrast on the pic to show it better, but I couldn't. That pic is really bad quality.

Neo wouldn't have been able to knock off Bane's head anyway, in the state he was in...he had just gotten the crap kicked out of him by Bane and had his eyes burned out. As soon as he killed Bane/Smith he pretty much crawled back over to the hatch to let Trin out of the fuse room. There was no way, with his injuries, that he'd be able to knock a person's head off.

it doesn't look like he's missing part of his arm. it's not my fault you don't know what threedimensionality is. the rest of his arm (and body) is just blocking view of it, which clearly isn't the case for his head. and your attached pic, i laugh at that. there's NO indication at all there's a head there, it's your imagination, sorry.

Oh yes. Explaining 3-d to an art student. That's a new one. I didn't say that Bane was missing an arm, I said that because of how the lighting fell and the poor quality of the picture, it looks like his arm is missing below the elbow. I know that his arm is being blocked by his body. Now here's my explanation to you.

You can see a shadow that extends from where Bane's shoulder's would be (if that picture was clear enough to see) to the wall. This shadow is round-shaped. The light is coming from behind Neo, meaning the only way there could be a shadow there is if Bane still had a head. If he had no head, there would not be a darker spot by where his shoulders would be.

And anyway, in that picture, about 2/3 of his head is off the bottom of the frame anyway.

Besides which, this thread wasn't arguing the existence of Bane's head, it was someone asking why Bane still had a head after Neo knocked off Smith's head.

Originally posted by Trinity_Matrix
And anyway, in that picture, about 2/3 of his head is off the bottom of the frame anyway.

Besides which, this thread wasn't arguing the existence of Bane's head, it was someone asking why Bane still had a head after Neo knocked off Smith's head.


seems i'm dealing with a blind art student here. his neck, and thus his head (since he's lying there pretty much horizontally), is no where ****ing near the bottom of the picture, its about 50 pixels off (roughly).

your last sentence makes me smile at your stupidity. i stated the threadposter's question was based on a false assumption and thus this thread is pointless. how come you don't understand this?

You can see his head when you're watching the film, but not in that picture.

no, you can't. i've seen it twice, i distinctly remember not seeing his head. and i payed special attention to it the second time. i guess we'll all see who's right when the dvd comes out, huh.

rys is right

🙂 yeah he is

does anyone here have a better pic.... where u can actually see sumthing?

the point *IS* you *CAN'T* see the head, because it's *NOT* there. 🙂